chore(conformance): meeting requirements for tier 1 (#1087)

* chore(conformance): meeting requirements for tier 1

* chore: address PR feedback
This commit is contained in:
Alex Hancock 2026-07-30 11:36:12 -04:00 • committed by GitHub
commit 51c8ee60e3
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1,116 +1,96 @@
# RMCP Roadmap
This roadmap tracks the path to SEP-1730 Tier 1 for the Rust MCP SDK.
This roadmap tracks the path to [SEP-1730](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues/1730) Tier 1 for the Rust MCP SDK.
Spec 2025-11-25 (suite 0.1.16): Server 100% (30/30) · Client 100% (18/18)
Spec 2026-07-28 (suite 0.2.0-alpha.9): Server 97.5% (39/40) · Client 90.6% (29/32)
**Status (2026-07-29):** conformance is 100% across every date-versioned suite, and
the stable **v3.0.0** release has shipped. The remaining Tier 1 work is documentation
coverage and two governance documents.
Extension scenarios are reported separately below because they are
informational and do not count toward SDK tiering.
| Suite (date-versioned) | Server | Client |
| ---------------------- | ------------- | ------------- |
| 2025-11-25 | 100% (30/30) | 100% |
| 2026-07-28 | 100% (30/30) | 100% |
Only date-versioned scenarios count toward SDK tiering. `draft` (2026-07-28 draft)
and `extension` scenarios are informational and reported separately below.
---
## Target spec: 2026-07-28 (release 2026-07-28)
## Conformance
All 2026-07-28 work carries the `2026-07-28` label and the
[`2026-07-28 spec` milestone](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/milestone/3).
Per-scenario conformance status is tracked in the epic issue:
[#977 — Tracking: 2026-07-28 spec conformance](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/issues/977).
Per-scenario status for the current spec is tracked in the epic issue
[#977 — Tracking: 2026-07-28 spec conformance](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/issues/977),
under the [`2026-07-28 spec` milestone](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/milestone/3).
### Versioned-spec conformance (baseline 2026-07-21, suite `0.2.0-alpha.9`)
CI (`.github/workflows/conformance.yml`) runs the full `2025-11-25` and `2026-07-28`
server and client suites on every push and PR. Both suites are fully green.
- Server: 1 expected failure: `json-schema-2020-12`
- Client: 3 expected failures: `tools_call`, `auth/scope-step-up`, and `auth/authorization-server-migration`
- CI: runs the complete `2026-07-28` versioned-spec suites with a strict baseline; an unlisted failure or a listed scenario that starts passing fails the build
### Informational (not scored for tiering)
### Extension conformance (informational)
Extension-tagged scenarios are excluded by `--spec-version` filters, so CI runs them
in separate steps against `conformance/expected-failures-extensions.yaml`:
Extension-tagged scenarios are excluded by `--spec-version` filters, so CI
runs them in separate server and client steps with
`conformance/expected-failures-extensions.yaml`.
- SEP-2663 Tasks server: 9 expected failures; `tasks-status-notifications` is currently skipped by the upstream harness; tracked in #868
- Client extensions: `auth/client-credentials-basic` and `auth/client-credentials-jwt` pass; `auth/enterprise-managed-authorization` is an expected failure
| Scenario | Tag | Status |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ |
| `auth/client-credentials-basic` | extension | ✅ Pass |
| `auth/client-credentials-jwt` | extension | ✅ Pass |
| `auth/enterprise-managed-authorization` | extension | ❌ Expected failure (not implemented by the conformance client) |
| `auth/wif-jwt-bearer` | 2026-07-28 draft | ❌ Expected failure (WIF / SEP-1933, draft) |
| `tasks-*` (SEP-2663) | extension | ❌ 9 expected failures · ⏭️ 1 upstream-skipped |
### Spec features without conformance scenarios
Conformance alone does not cover the full spec surface. Feature work tracked via the milestone:
Conformance does not cover the entire spec surface. Remaining feature work tracked via
the milestone:
- SEP-2567 sessionless MCP via explicit state handles (#870)
- SEP-2260 server requests must associate with a client request (#873)
- SEP-2549 follow-up: client-side TTL-honoring cache (#974)
(SEP-2575 discovery & negotiation is covered by the `server-stateless` conformance scenario;
implementation is in review — #869, PRs #973, #943.)
### Release
The 2026-07-28 implementation ships as **v3.0.0** (release PR #964): MRTR, SEP-2549 cache hints,
SEP-2243 standard headers, and the SEP-2106 relaxations are merged but unreleased — tiering and
relegation are evaluated against the latest stable release, so cutting v3.0.0 with the remaining
conformance fixes is on the critical path. Migration guide (draft, kept current until release):
[discussion #969](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk/discussions/969).
---
## Tier 1 (non-conformance requirements)
## Tier 1 — remaining work
Conformance, stable release, labels, issue triage, and spec-tracking already meet the
Tier 1 bar. What's left:
### Documentation (Tier 1 requires all non-experimental features documented with examples)
The README now documents core primitives comprehensively with linked examples.
### Governance & Policy
- [ ] Create `VERSIONING.md` — document semver scheme, what constitutes a breaking change, and how breaking changes are communicated
- [ ] Publish a dependency update policy (Tier 1 requires a published policy)
- [ ] Cut v3.0.0 (#964) including all conformance fixes (tier relegation is evaluated against the latest stable release)
- [ ] Add `VERSIONING.md` — document the semver scheme, what constitutes a breaking
change, and how breaking changes are communicated (migration guides are linked
from the README but the policy itself is not yet written down).
- [ ] Add `DEPENDENCY_POLICY.md` — a published dependency update policy (Dependabot is
configured in `.github/dependabot.yml`, but Tier 1 requires a written, findable policy).
- [ ] Re-triage mislabeled `P0` issues — #869 / #871 / #872 are SEP *feature*
implementation tasks, not critical bugs; they should not carry `P0`. Reserving
`P0` for genuine critical bugs keeps the SEP-1730 critical-bug-resolution metric
accurate.
### Documentation (26/48 → 48/48 features with prose + examples)
### Nice-to-have (scorecard hygiene)
#### Undocumented features (14)
- [ ] Tools — image results
- [ ] Tools — audio results
- [ ] Tools — embedded resources
- [ ] Prompts — embedded resources
- [ ] Prompts — image content
- [ ] Elicitation — URL mode
- [ ] Elicitation — default values
- [ ] Elicitation — complete notification
- [ ] Ping
- [ ] SSE transport — legacy (client)
- [ ] SSE transport — legacy (server)
- [ ] Pagination
- [ ] Protocol version negotiation
- [ ] JSON Schema 2020-12 support *(upgrade from partial)*
#### Partially documented features (7)
- [ ] Tools — error handling *(add dedicated prose + example)*
- [ ] Resources — reading binary *(add dedicated example)*
- [ ] Elicitation — form mode *(add prose docs, not just example README)*
- [ ] Elicitation — schema validation *(add prose docs)*
- [ ] Elicitation — enum values *(add prose docs)*
- [ ] Capability negotiation *(add dedicated prose explaining the builder API)*
- [ ] Protocol version negotiation *(document version negotiation behavior)*
- [ ] Add a top-level `CHANGELOG.md` (release notes are currently managed by release-plz).
- [ ] Add a top-level `CONTRIBUTING.md` (contributor docs currently live at `docs/CONTRIBUTE.MD`).
---
## Completed
- [x] 2025-11-25 server conformance 100% (30 scenarios + pending `json-schema-2020-12`, `server-sse-polling`)
- [x] 2025-11-25 client conformance 100% (18 scenarios + legacy `auth/2025-03-26-*`)
- [x] SEP-2322 MRTR (14 server scenarios + `sep-2322-client-request-state`)
- [x] **v3.0.0 stable released** (2026-07-28) — MRTR, SEP-2549 cache hints, SEP-2243
standard headers, SEP-2575 stateless MCP, and SEP-2106 relaxations
- [x] 2025-11-25 server conformance 100% (30/30)
- [x] 2025-11-25 client conformance 100%
- [x] 2026-07-28 server conformance 100% (30/30 dated)
- [x] 2026-07-28 client conformance 100% (dated)
- [x] SEP-2322 MRTR (server scenarios + `sep-2322-client-request-state`)
- [x] SEP-2575 Make MCP Stateless (`server-stateless`)
- [x] SEP-2164 resource not found
- [x] Cache hints (`caching`)
- [x] `http-header-validation`
- [x] Issue triage labels (bug, enhancement, needs confirmation, needs repro, ready for work, P0–P3)
---
## Informational (not scored for tiering)
These extension scenarios are tracked but do not count toward tier advancement:
| Scenario | Tag | Status |
|---|---|---|
| `auth/client-credentials-jwt` | extension | ✅ Passed |
| `auth/client-credentials-basic` | extension | ✅ Passed |
| `auth/enterprise-managed-authorization` | extension | ❌ Failed — scenario is not implemented by the conformance client |
| `tasks-*` | extension | ❌ 9 expected failures · ⏭️ 1 upstream-skipped scenario |
- [x] SEP-2549 cache hints (`caching`)
- [x] SEP-2243 HTTP standardization (`http-header-validation`, standard headers)
- [x] DNS rebinding protection
- [x] Full SEP-1730 issue-triage label taxonomy (bug, enhancement, question,
needs confirmation, needs repro, ready for work, good first issue, help wanted, P0–P3)
- [x] `SECURITY.md` and Dependabot configuration