fix(sequential-thinking): Keep case of json params and description same
Models are confused about the case of the variables, which results into random validation errors. Keeping them the same helps to remove back and forth.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a86e8cdfb
commit
6dda92b77b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -44,14 +44,14 @@ Parameters explained:
|
|||
* Changes in approach
|
||||
* Hypothesis generation
|
||||
* Hypothesis verification
|
||||
- next_thought_needed: True if you need more thinking, even if at what seemed like the end
|
||||
- thought_number: Current number in sequence (can go beyond initial total if needed)
|
||||
- total_thoughts: Current estimate of thoughts needed (can be adjusted up/down)
|
||||
- is_revision: A boolean indicating if this thought revises previous thinking
|
||||
- revises_thought: If is_revision is true, which thought number is being reconsidered
|
||||
- branch_from_thought: If branching, which thought number is the branching point
|
||||
- branch_id: Identifier for the current branch (if any)
|
||||
- needs_more_thoughts: If reaching end but realizing more thoughts needed
|
||||
- nextThoughtNeeded: True if you need more thinking, even if at what seemed like the end
|
||||
- thoughtNumber: Current number in sequence (can go beyond initial total if needed)
|
||||
- totalThoughts: Current estimate of thoughts needed (can be adjusted up/down)
|
||||
- isRevision: A boolean indicating if this thought revises previous thinking
|
||||
- revisesThought: If is_revision is true, which thought number is being reconsidered
|
||||
- branchFromThought: If branching, which thought number is the branching point
|
||||
- branchId: Identifier for the current branch (if any)
|
||||
- needsMoreThoughts: If reaching end but realizing more thoughts needed
|
||||
|
||||
You should:
|
||||
1. Start with an initial estimate of needed thoughts, but be ready to adjust
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue