drop redundant resource canonicalization tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
b77361bd14
commit
8475e43f15
1 changed files with 0 additions and 133 deletions
|
|
@ -907,54 +907,6 @@ describe("OAuth Authorization", () => {
|
|||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("canonicalizes resource URI by removing fragment", async () => {
|
||||
// Mock successful metadata discovery
|
||||
mockFetch.mockImplementation((url) => {
|
||||
const urlString = url.toString();
|
||||
if (urlString.includes("/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server")) {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
status: 200,
|
||||
json: async () => ({
|
||||
issuer: "https://auth.example.com",
|
||||
authorization_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/authorize",
|
||||
token_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/token",
|
||||
response_types_supported: ["code"],
|
||||
code_challenge_methods_supported: ["S256"],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({ ok: false, status: 404 });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock provider methods
|
||||
(mockProvider.clientInformation as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
client_id: "test-client",
|
||||
client_secret: "test-secret",
|
||||
});
|
||||
(mockProvider.tokens as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.saveCodeVerifier as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
|
||||
// Call the auth function with a resource that has a fragment
|
||||
const result = await auth(mockProvider, {
|
||||
serverUrl: "https://api.example.com/mcp-server#fragment",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe("REDIRECT");
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify redirectToAuthorization was called with the canonicalized resource
|
||||
expect(mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
searchParams: expect.any(URLSearchParams),
|
||||
})
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const redirectCall = (mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0];
|
||||
const authUrl: URL = redirectCall[0];
|
||||
expect(authUrl.searchParams.get("resource")).toBe("https://api.example.com/mcp-server");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("passes resource parameter through authorization flow", async () => {
|
||||
// Mock successful metadata discovery
|
||||
mockFetch.mockImplementation((url) => {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1125,91 +1077,6 @@ describe("OAuth Authorization", () => {
|
|||
expect(body.get("refresh_token")).toBe("refresh123");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("handles derived resource parameter from serverUrl", async () => {
|
||||
// Mock successful metadata discovery
|
||||
mockFetch.mockImplementation((url) => {
|
||||
const urlString = url.toString();
|
||||
if (urlString.includes("/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server")) {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
status: 200,
|
||||
json: async () => ({
|
||||
issuer: "https://auth.example.com",
|
||||
authorization_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/authorize",
|
||||
token_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/token",
|
||||
response_types_supported: ["code"],
|
||||
code_challenge_methods_supported: ["S256"],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({ ok: false, status: 404 });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock provider methods
|
||||
(mockProvider.clientInformation as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
client_id: "test-client",
|
||||
client_secret: "test-secret",
|
||||
});
|
||||
(mockProvider.tokens as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.saveCodeVerifier as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
|
||||
// Call auth with just serverUrl (resource is derived from it)
|
||||
const result = await auth(mockProvider, {
|
||||
serverUrl: "https://api.example.com/mcp-server",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe("REDIRECT");
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that resource parameter is always included (derived from serverUrl)
|
||||
const redirectCall = (mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0];
|
||||
const authUrl: URL = redirectCall[0];
|
||||
expect(authUrl.searchParams.has("resource")).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(authUrl.searchParams.get("resource")).toBe("https://api.example.com/mcp-server");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("handles resource with multiple fragments", async () => {
|
||||
// Mock successful metadata discovery
|
||||
mockFetch.mockImplementation((url) => {
|
||||
const urlString = url.toString();
|
||||
if (urlString.includes("/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server")) {
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
status: 200,
|
||||
json: async () => ({
|
||||
issuer: "https://auth.example.com",
|
||||
authorization_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/authorize",
|
||||
token_endpoint: "https://auth.example.com/token",
|
||||
response_types_supported: ["code"],
|
||||
code_challenge_methods_supported: ["S256"],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Promise.resolve({ ok: false, status: 404 });
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock provider methods
|
||||
(mockProvider.clientInformation as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
client_id: "test-client",
|
||||
client_secret: "test-secret",
|
||||
});
|
||||
(mockProvider.tokens as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.saveCodeVerifier as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
(mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
|
||||
// Call auth with resource containing multiple # symbols
|
||||
const result = await auth(mockProvider, {
|
||||
serverUrl: "https://api.example.com/mcp-server#fragment#another",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBe("REDIRECT");
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify the resource is properly canonicalized (everything after first # removed)
|
||||
const redirectCall = (mockProvider.redirectToAuthorization as jest.Mock).mock.calls[0];
|
||||
const authUrl: URL = redirectCall[0];
|
||||
expect(authUrl.searchParams.get("resource")).toBe("https://api.example.com/mcp-server");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("verifies resource parameter distinguishes between different paths on same domain", async () => {
|
||||
// Mock successful metadata discovery
|
||||
mockFetch.mockImplementation((url) => {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue