Both deploy and cleanup previously read context.payload.pull_request.number directly, which throws on workflow_dispatch and other non-PR triggers. New optional inputs: - deploy: pr-number (default: event PR number), commit-sha (default: github.sha) - cleanup: pr-number (default: event PR number) If pr-number resolves to empty/0, the comment step is skipped gracefully instead of crashing. This lets /stageblog's companion workflow_dispatch receiver call the composite deploy action directly instead of inlining wrangler + noindex injection. The noindex logic staying in the actions repo (rather than in a script file inside the caller repo that gets checked out at the fork's SHA) is also the secure path — fork authors can't tamper with it. The slash-commands README example is updated to use the deploy action with the new inputs. The earlier commit on this branch (which rewrote the example to call wrangler directly) is effectively superseded.
241 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
241 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# slash-commands
|
|
|
|
Reusable composite action that implements Prow-style `/lgtm`, `/hold`, and
|
|
`/stageblog` slash commands on pull requests, gated by team membership and
|
|
CODEOWNERS.
|
|
|
|
## What it does
|
|
|
|
Listens for PR comments and push events, then:
|
|
|
|
- **`/lgtm`** — if the commenter is a core maintainer _or_ a CODEOWNER of the
|
|
PR's changed files, adds an `approved` label and submits a bot **APPROVE**
|
|
review with body "Approved on behalf of @user via `/lgtm`."
|
|
- **`/lgtm cancel`** — removes the `approved` label and dismisses the bot
|
|
review.
|
|
- **`/hold`** — adds a `do-not-merge/hold` label (same authorization rule).
|
|
- **`/hold cancel`** or **`/unhold`** — removes the hold label.
|
|
- **`/stageblog`** — if the PR touches any blog paths (default `blog/**`),
|
|
dispatches a caller-defined `workflow_dispatch` workflow passing the PR
|
|
number and the PR's head SHA **at the time of the comment**. Intended for
|
|
letting maintainers manually stage blog previews for fork PRs (where the
|
|
normal `pull_request`-triggered preview workflow can't access secrets).
|
|
Disabled unless `stageblog-workflow` is set.
|
|
- **New commits pushed** — removes the `approved` label, dismisses the bot
|
|
review, and posts a brief comment asking for re-approval.
|
|
|
|
Commands are parsed from the **first line** of the comment (case-insensitive,
|
|
must match `^/cmd\b`). Unauthorized attempts, or a PR author trying to `/lgtm`
|
|
their own PR, receive a 👎 reaction with no further noise. Successful commands
|
|
receive a 👍 reaction.
|
|
|
|
The caller workflow adds a separate `status` job that reports a required check
|
|
which passes only when `approved` is present and `do-not-merge/hold` is absent
|
|
— making the labels an actual merge gate via branch protection.
|
|
|
|
## Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
- The `approved` and `do-not-merge/hold` labels **must already exist** in the
|
|
caller repo (the action does not auto-create them). Suggested colors:
|
|
`approved` → `#0e8a16`, `do-not-merge/hold` → `#d93f0b`.
|
|
- A CODEOWNERS file at `.github/CODEOWNERS` (or pass a different path via
|
|
`codeowners-path`). Without one, only `always-allow-teams` members can act.
|
|
|
|
## Required secrets
|
|
|
|
Create this secret in the caller repo: GitHub → repo → **Settings → Secrets
|
|
and variables → Actions → New repository secret**.
|
|
|
|
| Repo secret name | Action input | Value |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| `SLASH_COMMANDS_TOKEN` | `github-token` | Fine-grained PAT (or GitHub App installation token) with **Organization → Members: read** plus **Repository → Contents: read, Pull requests: write, Issues: write**. If `/stageblog` is enabled, additionally **Repository → Actions: write**. |
|
|
|
|
> **The default `${{ github.token }}` will NOT work.** Team-membership checks
|
|
> (`GET /orgs/{org}/teams/{team}/memberships/{user}`) require `read:org` scope,
|
|
> which the automatic `GITHUB_TOKEN` never has — even with a `permissions:`
|
|
> block. You _must_ provide a PAT or App token.
|
|
|
|
### `SLASH_COMMANDS_TOKEN`
|
|
|
|
**Option A — fine-grained PAT (recommended for single-repo setups):**
|
|
|
|
GitHub → **Settings → Developer settings → Personal access tokens → Fine-grained
|
|
tokens → Generate new token**. Configure:
|
|
|
|
| Section | Setting |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Resource owner | `modelcontextprotocol` (or your org) |
|
|
| Repository access | **Only select repositories** → pick the caller repo |
|
|
| Repository permissions → Contents | Read-only |
|
|
| Repository permissions → Pull requests | Read and write |
|
|
| Repository permissions → Issues | Read and write |
|
|
| Organization permissions → Members | Read-only |
|
|
| Repository permissions → Actions | Read and write _(only if `stageblog-workflow` is set)_ |
|
|
|
|
Do not grant any write permissions beyond Pull requests + Issues. **Contents**
|
|
must remain read-only — the action never writes code.
|
|
|
|
**Option B — GitHub App installation token:**
|
|
|
|
If your org already uses a bot App, generate an installation token with the
|
|
same scopes and store it as `SLASH_COMMANDS_TOKEN`. The App must be installed
|
|
on the caller repo _and_ have org-level **Members: read**.
|
|
|
|
## Caller workflow requirements
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| **Triggers** | `issue_comment` (types: `created`) + `pull_request_target` (types: `synchronize`, `opened`, `reopened`, `labeled`, `unlabeled`) |
|
|
| **Permissions** | `pull-requests: write`, `issues: write`, `contents: read`. If `/stageblog` is enabled, also `actions: write`. |
|
|
| **Fork-PR safety** | No special guard needed — `issue_comment` and `pull_request_target` both run in the **base** repo's context with the base workflow definition, so fork authors cannot modify the logic. CODEOWNERS is also fetched from the PR's **base** ref, never the head. |
|
|
| **No checkout** | The action calls GitHub API only. Do not `actions/checkout` PR code. |
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
name: Slash Commands
|
|
|
|
on:
|
|
issue_comment:
|
|
types: [created]
|
|
pull_request_target:
|
|
types: [synchronize, opened, reopened, labeled, unlabeled]
|
|
|
|
permissions:
|
|
pull-requests: write
|
|
issues: write
|
|
contents: read
|
|
|
|
jobs:
|
|
handle:
|
|
if: >-
|
|
(github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && github.event.issue.pull_request) ||
|
|
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && github.event.action == 'synchronize')
|
|
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
steps:
|
|
- uses: modelcontextprotocol/actions/slash-commands@main
|
|
with:
|
|
github-token: ${{ secrets.SLASH_COMMANDS_TOKEN }}
|
|
always-allow-teams: core-maintainers,lead-maintainers
|
|
# stageblog-workflow: stage-blog.yml # uncomment to enable /stageblog
|
|
|
|
# Merge-gate status check — make this a required check in branch protection.
|
|
status:
|
|
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'
|
|
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
steps:
|
|
- name: Require approval, block on hold
|
|
env:
|
|
LABELS: ${{ toJson(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name) }}
|
|
run: |
|
|
echo "Labels: $LABELS"
|
|
if ! jq -e 'contains(["approved"])' <<<"$LABELS" > /dev/null; then
|
|
echo "::error::Missing 'approved' label — comment /lgtm"
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
if jq -e 'contains(["do-not-merge/hold"])' <<<"$LABELS" > /dev/null; then
|
|
echo "::error::'do-not-merge/hold' present — resolve, then /unhold"
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
echo "approved and not held"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Enabling `/stageblog` — companion workflow
|
|
|
|
When `stageblog-workflow` is set, you also need a separate workflow in the
|
|
caller repo that receives the dispatch. Example `stage-blog.yml`:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
name: Stage Blog (fork PRs)
|
|
|
|
on:
|
|
workflow_dispatch:
|
|
inputs:
|
|
pr_number:
|
|
required: true
|
|
type: string
|
|
head_sha:
|
|
required: true
|
|
type: string
|
|
|
|
permissions:
|
|
contents: read
|
|
pull-requests: write
|
|
|
|
jobs:
|
|
build-and-deploy:
|
|
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
steps:
|
|
- uses: actions/checkout@v6
|
|
with:
|
|
ref: ${{ inputs.head_sha }} # pinned — do NOT re-fetch the PR head
|
|
|
|
# ... your blog build steps → output to blog/public ...
|
|
|
|
- uses: modelcontextprotocol/actions/cloudflare-pages-preview/deploy@main
|
|
with:
|
|
directory: blog/public
|
|
project-name: mcp-blog-preview
|
|
api-token: ${{ secrets.CF_PAGES_PREVIEW_API_TOKEN }}
|
|
account-id: ${{ secrets.CF_PAGES_PREVIEW_ACCOUNT_ID }}
|
|
branch: pr-${{ inputs.pr_number }}
|
|
pr-number: ${{ inputs.pr_number }}
|
|
commit-sha: ${{ inputs.head_sha }}
|
|
comment-title: "Blog Preview (staged via /stageblog)"
|
|
comment-marker: "<!-- stage-blog-comment -->"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Inputs
|
|
|
|
| Input | Required | Default | Description |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| `github-token` | ✅ | — | PAT or App token with `read:org` + repo `pull-requests: write` + `issues: write` + `contents: read`. **Default `GITHUB_TOKEN` will not work** for team checks. |
|
|
| `approved-label` | | `approved` | Label added by `/lgtm` |
|
|
| `hold-label` | | `do-not-merge/hold` | Label added by `/hold` |
|
|
| `always-allow-teams` | | `core-maintainers` | Comma-separated team slugs (in the repo's org) whose members can `/lgtm` or `/hold` any PR regardless of CODEOWNERS |
|
|
| `codeowners-path` | | `.github/CODEOWNERS` | Path to CODEOWNERS, fetched from the PR's **base** ref (never head — tamper-proof) |
|
|
| `invalidate-on-push` | | `'true'` | Remove `approved` label + dismiss bot review + comment when new commits are pushed. Set `'false'` to keep approval across pushes. |
|
|
| `submit-review` | | `'true'` | Submit a bot APPROVE review alongside the label on `/lgtm`. Set `'false'` to use label only. |
|
|
| `stageblog-workflow` | | _(empty)_ | Workflow file name (e.g. `stage-blog.yml`) to dispatch when `/stageblog` is invoked. Empty = command disabled. The workflow must accept `pr_number` and `head_sha` string inputs. |
|
|
| `stageblog-paths` | | `blog/**` | Comma-separated CODEOWNERS-style glob patterns. `/stageblog` is refused if no changed file matches. |
|
|
|
|
## Outputs
|
|
|
|
| Output | Description |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| `result` | One of: `lgtm-added`, `lgtm-removed`, `hold-added`, `hold-removed`, `invalidated`, `unauthorized`, `self-lgtm-blocked`, `stageblog-dispatched`, `stageblog-not-blog`, `stageblog-disabled`, `noop` |
|
|
| `actor` | Login of the commenter (empty for non-comment triggers) |
|
|
|
|
## CODEOWNERS pattern support
|
|
|
|
The inline CODEOWNERS parser handles the patterns currently used in MCP repos:
|
|
|
|
| Pattern | Supported | Meaning |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| `/path/` | ✅ | Anchored directory prefix (matches anything under `path/`) |
|
|
| `/path/to/file.ext` | ✅ | Exact anchored path |
|
|
| `*.ext` | ✅ | Any file with extension `.ext` at any depth |
|
|
| `/path/**/*.ext` | ✅ | Glob at any depth under `/path/` |
|
|
| `**/file` | ✅ | File named `file` at any depth |
|
|
| `@user` / `@org/team` | ✅ | Owner: individual user or team (team org must match repo org) |
|
|
| `!negation` | ❌ | Not supported (not in use in MCP repos) |
|
|
| Escaped spaces (`\ `) | ❌ | Not supported |
|
|
|
|
Last-match-wins per file, consistent with GitHub's native CODEOWNERS semantics.
|
|
|
|
## Security notes
|
|
|
|
- **Comment body injection** — command parsing is a fixed regex on the
|
|
first line in JS; comment text is never interpolated into a shell.
|
|
- **CODEOWNERS tampering** — fetched from `pr.base.ref`, never the PR head.
|
|
An attacker cannot add themselves as CODEOWNER in the PR under review.
|
|
- **Workflow modification** — `issue_comment` and `pull_request_target` run
|
|
from the default-branch workflow definition. The action does not check out
|
|
PR code.
|
|
- **Self-approval** — explicitly blocked before the auth check.
|
|
- **`/stageblog` SHA pinning** — the dispatch passes `pr.head.sha` captured at
|
|
the moment the maintainer comments. The companion workflow **must** check
|
|
out `inputs.head_sha` (not `refs/pull/N/head` or `pr.head.ref`) so a fork
|
|
author cannot push new commits between the maintainer's review and the build.
|
|
- **Review provenance** — the bot review body always names the real approver
|
|
("on behalf of @login"), even though GitHub shows the review as bot-authored.
|