Commit graph conformance/src/scenarios/client/auth/spec-references.ts
Author SHA1 Message Date
PieterKas
6e726734f5
Client Auth: DPoP Sender-Constrained Tokens (SEP-1932) (#394)
* Add DPoP client conformance scenario + shared DPoP helpers (SEP-1932, #368)

Client-anchored packaging: carries the shared DPoP foundation (dpopProof /
dpopToken helpers, the createAuthServer DPoP core, and sep-1932.yaml) together
with the client scenario, so it can merge first; the server (#369) and
authorization-server (#370) scenarios are follow-ups that depend on it.

DPoP is treated as a draft/not-yet-official feature (mirroring the WIF SEP-1933
scenario): the scenario's source is `introducedIn: DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION` and
it is registered in draftScenariosList (informational, not scored). It is NOT
registered in EXTENSION_IDS, since the ext-auth DPoP extension is still on a
branch rather than merged.

Client checks (the two extension MUSTs, RFC 9449 §7.1 / §4.2-4.3):
- sep-1932-client-dpop-auth-scheme — token presented with the DPoP scheme.
- sep-1932-client-fresh-proof — a fresh, well-formed DPoP proof per request.

The test MCP server judges the client via an opt-in DPoP middleware
(dpopResourceAuth) passed through createServer's authMiddleware hook; a compliant
example client (covered by the Client Draft Scenarios loop) plus deliberately-
broken bearer/replay variants drive the pass/fail acceptance tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* client/dpop: split into nonce-less baseline + nonce-required scenario

Server-provided nonces are optional in RFC 9449 (AS §8 "MAY", RS §9 "can
also choose"), and the nonce-less flow is the common case. The single
auth/dpop scenario hard-wired nonce enforcement on both the test AS and
MCP server, so a plain nonce-less proof was never accepted end-to-end and
a client that only does plain proofs was never exercised on its happy path.

Parameterize DPoPClientScenario with `requireNonce` and register it twice:
- auth/dpop        (requireNonce=false) — nonce-less baseline; emits the
  three baseline checks (token-request-proof, dpop-auth-scheme, fresh-proof).
- auth/dpop-nonce  (requireNonce=true)  — prior behavior; adds as-nonce and
  rs-nonce (five checks).

Check IDs are reused (no new IDs, no sep-1932.yaml change); the two nonce
checks are emitted only by auth/dpop-nonce, so traceability stays intact.

Add auth-test-dpop-no-nonce.ts (nonce-incapable but otherwise compliant)
asserting SUCCESS against auth/dpop — proof that a client with no nonce
handling still completes DPoP when the server does not require a nonce.
Baseline negatives stay on auth/dpop (nonce-independent); the two nonce
negatives are re-pointed to auth/dpop-nonce.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* client/dpop: round-4 nonce-surface correctness fixes

Address review findings on the auth/dpop-nonce posture:

- Record the token-request proof observation BEFORE the §8 nonce challenge,
  so a client that is challenged but does not retry is no longer mis-reported
  by token-request-proof as "never completed a token request" (its proof was
  just validated). (#2)
- Record the resource-request jti/replay on ANY valid proof (before the §9
  nonce gate), so fresh-proof is never asserted on zero evidence and a client
  that never honours the RS nonce fails ONLY rs-nonce. (#5)
- Require challengeIssued && honored for as-nonce/rs-nonce SUCCESS, closing a
  vacuous-pass path (a client that pre-sends the nonce is never challenged). (#3a)
- Gate the AS nonce observation on the authorization_code exchange, matching
  recordTokenRequestProof (a refresh exchange must not satisfy §8). (#3c)
- Collapse duplicate shared token-flow check IDs (token-request, pkce-*) that
  the §8 round-trip re-POST would otherwise emit twice. (#4)
- Example client: retry the token request only on a use_dpop_nonce error code,
  not any 400 carrying a DPoP-Nonce header (consistent with the RS path). (#6)
- Fix the DpopTokenRequestObservation docstring ("last write wins" →
  sticky-failure). (#7)

Adds an expectedSuccessSlugs option to the client test helper and tightens the
two nonce negative tests to pin the now-clean behavior (token-request-proof
SUCCESS for no-as-nonce; only rs-nonce fails for no-rs-nonce).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* client/dpop: round-5 fixes — dedupe masking, wording, replay decision

- dedupeSharedChecks was masking failures: it kept the last occurrence of a
  duplicate check ID regardless of status and ran in BOTH postures, so a
  FAILURE on a challenged POST (or an earlier attempt in a restarted flow) was
  silently dropped. Replace with an exported, unit-tested collapseDuplicateChecks
  that prefers the MOST-SEVERE occurrence, and only apply it in the nonce
  posture (the baseline keeps genuinely distinct repeated attempts). (R5 #1)
- Reword the token-request-proof description: it can be SUCCESS for a client
  that presented a valid proof but never obtained a token (challenged, no
  retry), so it no longer claims "obtaining a DPoP-bound access token". (R5 #2)
- Reword the as-nonce/rs-nonce failure messages to cover a client that DID
  retry but whose retry proof was rejected (not only "did not retry"). (R5 #3)
- Document the deliberate replay decision: recording jti on challenged requests
  means re-sending the identical proof across the challenge/retry boundary trips
  replay detection — a genuine RFC 9449 §4.2 jti-uniqueness violation. (R5 #5)

Adds src/scenarios/client/auth/dpop.test.ts unit-testing collapseDuplicateChecks
(prefers failures, keeps INFO, preserves order) — the dedupe fix is now pinned.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* client/dpop: round-6 polish — pin collapse wiring; docstring

- Add an integration assertion that the §8/§9 double-POST is collapsed to one
  token-request/pkce-* entry each in auth/dpop-nonce, so the requireNonce gating
  of collapseDuplicateChecks can't be silently deleted or inverted (previously
  mutation-survivable). runClientAgainstScenario now returns the emitted checks
  so callers can make occurrence-level assertions (backward-compatible).
- Docstring: note the severity ladder ranks SKIPPED below SUCCESS, and that
  equal-severity ties keep the last occurrence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-10 17:13:02 +01:00
Robin Otto
1ca3bc301b
feat(auth): client conformance for Workload Identity Federation (SEP-1933) (#268)
* feat(auth): add JWT-bearer helper for WIF client conformance (SEP-1933)

Adds createWorkloadJwt and generateWorkloadKeypair to provide reusable,
tested JWT signing infrastructure for the upcoming wif-jwt-bearer scenario
(PR #2). Also extracts JWT_BEARER_GRANT_TYPE constant and migrates
cross-app-access.ts to use it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(auth): add JWT-bearer helper for WIF client conformance (SEP-1933)

Adds createWorkloadJwt and generateWorkloadKeypair to provide reusable,
tested JWT signing infrastructure for the upcoming wif-jwt-bearer scenario
(PR #2). Also extracts JWT_BEARER_GRANT_TYPE constant and migrates
cross-app-access.ts to use it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(auth): add WIF JWT-bearer scenario and negative tests (SEP-1933)

Adds the auth/wif-jwt-bearer client conformance scenario using the RFC 7523
JWT-bearer grant (urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer).

The scenario pre-signs valid, wrong-audience, and expired JWTs on start()
to simulate cloud workload identity tokens. The conformance AS verifies the
assertion and emits per-class checks (wif-assertion-verified,
wif-assertion-missing, wif-assertion-audience, wif-assertion-expired,
wif-assertion-malformed). Broken example clients exercise the missing-assertion
and wrong-audience failure paths.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: apply prettier formatting to wif-jwt-bearer.ts

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(auth): add expired-assertion negative test; clarify wif-jwt-bearer comments

- Add runWifJwtBearerExpiredAssertion + auth-test-wif-expired-assertion.ts
  to exercise the wif-assertion-expired check path (was dead code)
- Clarify WifAssertionVerified description to note iss is not validated
- Add comment explaining clockTolerance: 5 is intentional (same-run keypair)
- Add comment explaining numeric expiresIn is absolute epoch seconds

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): disable DCR, detect retries, improve getChecks description

- Add WIF_CLIENT_ID constant; pre-seed provider's clientInformation() so
  the SDK skips Dynamic Client Registration entirely (disableDynamicRegistration
  on the auth server + pre-seeded client_id on the provider side)
- Add failedOnce/tokenRequestReceived tracking on the scenario; reject and
  record wif-no-retry FAILURE if the client attempts a second token request
  after the first fails
- Add hasAttempted guard in WifJwtBearerProvider.prepareTokenRequest() to
  throw on retry from the client side
- Fix getChecks() sentinel description: distinguish "no request made" from
  "request made but verification failed"
- Add client_id to context and Zod schema

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: prettier formatting on everything-client.ts

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): let errors propagate from broken example clients

The try/catch blocks were silently swallowing auth failures, so the
negative tests passed purely because expectedFailureSlugs found the
AS-emitted check — not because client error-surfacing was verified.
allowClientError: true on the test cases handles the non-zero exit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): tag as draft, add scope-rejected check, add SEP traceability

- Change specVersions from ['extension'] to [DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION] and add
  source = { introducedIn: DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION } so the scenario is
  reachable via --spec-version draft (extension tag excluded it from all
  spec-version runs)
- Move registration from extensionScenariosList to draftScenariosList in
  index.ts to match the tag/list convention enforced by spec-version.test.ts
- Add wif-assertion-scope-rejected check: AS returns invalid_scope for a
  valid JWT when the client requests the reserved 'wif.rejected' scope;
  verify client surfaces the error and does not retry
- Add runWifJwtBearerScopeRejected to everything-client.ts; add optional
  scope param to WifJwtBearerProvider; add CLI entry point and vitest case
- Add src/seps/sep-1933.yaml with requirements mapped to each check ID,
  covering the three deferred checks (iss, sub, jti) with exclusion rationale

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: prettier formatting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(wif-jwt-bearer): add wif-grant-fallback check for unauthorized_client fallback

Client bug class: WIF client receives unauthorized_client from JWT-bearer grant
and silently switches to authorization_code instead of surfacing the error.

The MCP SDK retries after UnauthorizedClientError (auth.js:152-154), calling
prepareTokenRequest() a second time. WifGrantFallbackProvider exploits this by
returning authorization_code params on the second call.

Spec anchor: RFC 7523 §2.1 — clients MUST use the JWT-bearer grant type;
silent grant-type switching hides authentication failures.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: rename unused scope param in WifGrantFallbackProvider

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(wif-jwt-bearer): use realistic SPIFFE and K8s PSAT token formats

valid_jwt uses a SPIFFE JWT-SVID subject (spiffe://conformance-test.local/...)
issued by a SPIRE-style issuer. wrong_audience_jwt uses a Kubernetes PSAT
subject and kubernetes.io claims, mirroring how K8s projected service-account
tokens look in production. Token verification and client behaviour are
unchanged; the formats ground the scenario in real workload identity platforms.

k8s_issuer and k8s_subject added to context and schema for external clients
that want to construct their own K8s-style assertions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* style: prettier formatting on wif-jwt-bearer.ts

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(wif-jwt-bearer): drop informational k8s_issuer/k8s_subject from context

These fields were not used by any client handler and are redundant since
the K8s claims are already baked into wrong_audience_jwt.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): address pre-merge review feedback

- Downgrade wif-no-retry, wif-grant-fallback, and wif-assertion-scope-rejected
  to WARNING; RFC 7523 is silent on client retry and grant-type switching, so
  FAILURE status was not traceable to spec text
- Add WifRetryProvider broken client that re-sends JWT-bearer after
  unauthorized_client, making wif-no-retry actually exercisable as a WARNING
- Drop getChecks() sentinel (non-standard pattern that overloaded the
  wif-assertion-verified check ID); test harness detects empty check sets
- Add comment on DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION workaround for runner limitation
- Add comment explaining why both slash/no-slash audience forms are accepted
- Tighten schema comments for audience URL constraint and ES256 literal

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): drop decorative fields and neutralise JWT fixtures

- Remove issuer and subject from context schema and scenario return value;
  neither is validated by the AS or used by the client, making them
  misleading. The iss exclusion rationale is updated to explain why.
- Replace SPIFFE/K8s-PSAT constants and the kubernetes.io additionalClaims
  with neutral values across all three JWT fixtures; no check inspects
  token format, so format flavour was decorative and invited false
  assumptions about fixture semantics.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): remove workaround comment, drop signing_algorithm, annotate retry provider

- Remove self-admitted workaround comment on DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION; the
  classification stands on its own and the comment was inviting challenge
- Drop signing_algorithm from context schema and scenario return; the field
  was redundant once the value was fixed to ES256, and the assertion is opaque
  to the client regardless
- Add comment to WifRetryProvider explaining it deliberately omits the
  hasAttempted guard so the SDK retry reaches the AS

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): export scope constants, remove unused AS field, annotate state machine

- Export WIF_TRIGGER_UNAUTHORIZED_SCOPE and WIF_REJECTED_SCOPE from
  createWorkloadJwt.ts and import them in everything-client.ts; removes
  duplicate bare-string declarations that could silently diverge
- Remove tokenEndpointAuthSigningAlgValuesSupported from mock AS config;
  the SDK does not consume this field in the JWT-bearer flow
- Add comment to onTokenRequest clarifying wif-no-retry and wif-grant-fallback
  fire on any second request after any failure, not only post-unauthorized_client

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): address pcarleton review comments

- Move all broken WIF provider classes and runners to wif-broken-clients.ts;
  everything-client.ts now contains only the conformant WifJwtBearerProvider
- Add sentinel in getChecks() for !tokenRequestReceived to prevent a silent
  pass when the client never sends a request
- Drop wif-assertion-scope-rejected check; the no-retry behaviour after
  invalid_scope is already covered by wif-no-retry, and sep-1933.yaml updated
  accordingly
- Remove audience from context schema and scenario return; the field was
  unused by any client implementation
- Expand scenario description to tell a client implementer what to implement
- Apply suggested description fix to wif-grant-fallback (does not assume
  unauthorized_client was the specific error that preceded the fallback)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(wif-jwt-bearer): drop number type from expiresIn, use jose duration strings

Jose supports negative duration strings ('-60s', '60 seconds ago') that produce
already-expired tokens without needing absolute epoch arithmetic. Drop the
number overload, update the expired_jwt call site to '-60s', and update the
unit test accordingly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-02 13:13:14 +00:00
Paul Carleton
e2e65e5595
Split draft-spec scenarios into their own suite (#317)
* feat: split draft-spec scenarios into their own suite

- add --suite draft to the server command, selecting scenarios whose
  source.introducedIn is the draft protocol version
- exclude draft scenarios from the default active suite until the draft
  spec is published as a dated release
- derive the client command's draft suite from source.introducedIn so the
  non-auth draft scenarios (SEP-2243/2575/2322/2106) are included alongside
  the auth ones
- keep everything-server self-test coverage for draft scenarios in
  all-scenarios.test.ts (active + non-pending draft)
- document available suites in the README and add suite-membership tests

* fix: repair broken specReferences URLs

- SEP-986: SEP/SEP-986.md no longer exists in the spec repo; point at the
  Tool Names section of the published 2025-11-25 tools page instead
- SEP-990: the ext-auth spec file is enterprise-managed-authorization.mdx,
  not enterprise-oauth.mdx

Fixes #313
2026-05-26 18:00:44 +01:00
Max Gerber
78d7219198
feat: add conformance tests for iss parameter (SEP-2468) (#220)
* feat: add conformance tests for iss parameter (SEP-2468)

Adds 5 draft conformance scenarios testing RFC 9207 issuer parameter
validation in OAuth authorization responses:

- auth/iss-supported: server advertises support and sends correct iss
- auth/iss-not-advertised: server omits iss parameter entirely
- auth/iss-supported-missing: client must reject missing iss when required
- auth/iss-wrong-issuer: client must reject mismatched iss value
- auth/iss-unexpected: client must reject iss when not advertised

Also adds auth-test-iss-validation.ts, a reference client that correctly
validates iss per RFC 9207, and negative tests confirming the standard
client fails all three rejection scenarios.

TODO: Update RFC_9207_ISS_PARAMETER spec reference once SEP-2468
(modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol#2468) is merged.

* update scenarios

* fix: createAuthServer iss option type/guard and NotAdvertised scenario duplication

The doc comments said 'Default: not included' but the destructure defaulted
to true/'correct', and the `!== undefined` guard at L155 was unreachable —
so there was no way to omit the metadata field, and IssParameterNotAdvertised
silently advertised support (a duplicate of IssParameterSupported).

Kept the on-by-default behavior (mock AS models a well-behaved server) but
made issParameterSupported `boolean | null` so callers pass null to omit,
matching the codeChallengeMethodsSupported pattern. Doc comments now match.
Scenarios that need omission pass null/'omit' explicitly.

* fix: rejection scenarios silently pass when client never reaches auth endpoint

correctlyRejected = !tokenRequestMade reports SUCCESS if the client errors
out before hitting /authorize. Gate on authReached so a setup failure shows
as FAILURE with authReached:false in details.

* fix: iss-unexpected scenario contradicts SEP-2468 spec table row 3

The spec table says: supported=false/absent + iss present -> *Compare* to
the recorded issuer (not reject). The scenario sent a *correct* iss and
FAILed compliant clients for proceeding after a successful comparison.

Now sends a mismatched iss so the comparison fails and rejection is the
spec-required outcome. Reference client updated to compare-when-present
instead of throw-on-presence.

* refactor: replace harness-config checks with client-proceeded checks

iss-advertised-in-metadata / iss-sent-in-redirect (and the not-* variants)
fired in onAuthorizationRequest before the redirect happened, asserting only
that the harness was configured correctly — a client that ignores iss passes
identically. Replaced with one check per scenario keyed on tokenRequestMade,
which observes that the client actually proceeded through the iss path.

* refactor: rename check IDs to sep-2468-* and align with spec table rows

One ID per spec table row; auth/iss-supported and auth/iss-wrong-issuer
both emit sep-2468-client-compare-iss-supported (same comparison, opposite
input) per the same-slug-for-SUCCESS-and-FAIL convention.

* feat: add sep-2468.yaml requirement traceability

8 check rows (4 client table-row checks, 1 metadata-issuer, 2 AS-side,
1 no-normalization), 1 excluded (error-display is UI-facing). The
record-issuer MUST is merged into the compare-iss-supported row text
since it has no independent wire observation.

* fix: migrate iss scenarios specVersions->source (post-#265)

Replaces `specVersions: ['draft']` with `source: { introducedIn: DRAFT_PROTOCOL_VERSION }`
in the 5 iss-parameter scenarios.

This commit typechecks once the stack is rebased onto main >= #265 (the
ScenarioSource migration). Adding it now so the rebase is mechanical.

* fix: include application_type in iss-validation example DCR (post-#284)

The SEP-837 application_type check now runs in every auth scenario; the
hand-rolled DCR in auth-test-iss-validation.ts was omitting the field.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Carleton <paulc@anthropic.com>
2026-05-19 23:42:35 +01:00
Wils Dawson
02a5f1c41d
feat (auth): add sep-2207 client checks (#166)
* feat: add sep-2207 client checks

* Update description for the offline access test

Co-authored-by: Paul Carleton <paulcarletonjr@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Carleton <paulcarletonjr@gmail.com>
2026-03-18 08:34:17 +00:00
sagar-okta
83c446ddf5
feat: add conformance tests for SEP-990 (#110)
* feat: add conformance tests for SEP-990

* Resolving review changes: Removed redundant tests, updated audience params

* fix: unused serverUrl parameter in runCrossAppAccessTokenExchange

* chore: apply prettier formatting

* fix: address PR review comments for SEP-990 conformance tests

- Delete unused separate token-exchange and jwt-bearer scenarios,
  keeping only the complete e2e flow (review comment)
- Add missing required token exchange params per SEP-990 spec:
  requested_token_type, audience, resource (review comment)
- Use ctx.idp_client_id for token exchange client_id instead of
  AS client_id (review comment)
- Client discovers resource and auth server via PRM metadata
  instead of receiving auth_server_url via context (review comment)
- Server IdP handler verifies all required token exchange params
  with detailed error messages (review comment)
- Add resource, client_id, jti claims to ID-JAG per SEP-990 spec
- Verify ID-JAG typ header (oauth-id-jag+jwt) in JWT bearer handler
- Remove auth_server_url from context schema

* feat: add client auth and ID-JAG validation to XAA conformance test

Server-side (AS) now verifies:
- client_secret_basic authentication on JWT bearer grant
- ID-JAG typ header is oauth-id-jag+jwt
- ID-JAG client_id claim matches the authenticating client (Section 5.1)
- ID-JAG resource claim matches the MCP server resource identifier
- Client credentials provided via context (client_secret)

Server-side (IdP) now:
- Sets ID-JAG client_id to the MCP Client's AS client_id (not the
  IdP client_id), per Section 6.1

Example client now:
- Authenticates to AS via client_secret_basic (Authorization: Basic)
  instead of sending client_id in body
- Checks AS metadata grant_types_supported includes jwt-bearer
  before attempting the flow

* fix: share MockTokenVerifier and remove unadvertised auth method

- Add shared MockTokenVerifier between AS and MCP server so the MCP
  server only accepts tokens actually issued by the auth server,
  matching the pattern used by all other auth scenarios
- Remove private_key_jwt from tokenEndpointAuthMethodsSupported since
  the handler only implements client_secret_basic

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Carleton <paulc@anthropic.com>
2026-02-13 17:47:54 +00:00
Paul Carleton
67ad358019
feat: add resource parameter validation tests (RFC 8707) (#118)
* feat: add resource parameter validation tests (RFC 8707)

Adds conformance tests for OAuth Resource Indicators (RFC 8707) implementation:

1. Resource parameter checks added to token-endpoint-auth-basic scenario:
   - resource-parameter-in-authorization: Verify resource in auth request
   - resource-parameter-in-token: Verify resource in token request
   - resource-parameter-valid-uri: Verify valid canonical URI
   - resource-parameter-consistency: Verify consistency between requests

2. New auth/resource-mismatch scenario:
   - Tests that client rejects when PRM resource doesn't match server URL
   - Server returns mismatched resource in PRM
   - Test passes if client does NOT proceed with authorization

Also adds spec references for RFC 8707 and MCP resource parameter spec.

Closes #33

* fix: make resource consistency check a FAILURE and remove dead code

- Change resource parameter consistency from WARNING to FAILURE
- Remove unreachable protocol check in validateCanonicalUri
  (URL constructor already validates scheme presence)
2026-01-23 18:21:46 +00:00
Paul Carleton
4a2ba8ae7b
feat: add PKCE conformance tests (#119)
* feat: add PKCE conformance tests

Adds conformance checks for PKCE requirements from the MCP auth spec:

- pkce-code-challenge-sent: Verifies client sends code_challenge in auth request
- pkce-s256-method-used: Verifies client uses S256 code challenge method
- pkce-code-verifier-sent: Verifies client sends code_verifier in token request
- pkce-verifier-matches-challenge: Validates BASE64URL(SHA256(verifier)) = challenge

Also adds auth/pkce-no-s256-support scenario that tests clients correctly
refuse when S256 is not in code_challenge_methods_supported.

All PKCE checks are added to the createAuthServer helper, so they automatically
apply to all existing auth scenarios.

Fixes #77

* feat: add bad client example that skips PKCE

Adds auth-test-no-pkce.ts which implements a custom OAuth flow that
deliberately skips PKCE (no code_challenge in auth request, no
code_verifier in token request).

Also adds negative test to verify the conformance suite correctly
detects this non-compliant behavior.

* chore: skip pkce-no-s256-support scenario for now

* chore: fix formatting

* refactor: remove pkce-no-s256-support scenario and always validate PKCE

- Remove pkce-no-s256-support scenario (was skipped anyway)
- Make pkce-verifier-matches-challenge fail if either code_challenge
  or code_verifier is missing, rather than only running when both present
- Update negative test to expect the new failure
2026-01-23 18:12:44 +00:00
Paul Carleton
2d52de5924
docs: add SDK integration guide and fix spec references (#121)
* docs: add SDK integration guide and fix spec references

- Add SDK_INTEGRATION.md with guide for SDK maintainers on integrating conformance tests
- Link to guide from README.md
- Update spec references to use 2025-11-25 instead of draft URLs

* fix: prettier formatting and correct action version to v0.1.10
2026-01-23 12:50:11 +00:00
Paul Carleton
245e44e882
feat: add pre-registration conformance test (#120)
* feat: add pre-registration conformance test

Add conformance test for OAuth pre-registration flow where the server
does NOT support Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) and clients must
use pre-configured static credentials.

This addresses issue #34 (Client Registration Methods) - specifically
the pre-registration section that was previously not covered.

Changes:
- Add disableDynamicRegistration option to createAuthServer helper
- Add auth/pre-registration scenario with pre-registered client creds
- Add MCP_PREREGISTRATION spec reference
- Add context schema for pre-registration credentials
- Add withOAuthRetryWithProvider helper for pre-configured providers
- Add negative test client (auth-test-attempts-dcr.ts) that ignores
  pre-registered credentials and fails

The scenario verifies that when a server does not advertise
registration_endpoint in its OAuth metadata, compliant clients
use pre-registered credentials passed via context instead of
attempting DCR.

Closes #34

* fix: add redirect_uris to saveClientInformation call

* chore: remove unused WithOAuthRetryOptions interface
2026-01-23 11:43:56 +00:00
Paul Carleton
b96a29a962
Add client credentials conformance tests (JWT and Basic auth) (#55)
* Add client credentials conformance scenarios with dynamic keypair generation

Implements SEP-1046 client credentials conformance tests:
- auth/client-credentials-jwt: Tests private_key_jwt authentication
- auth/client-credentials-basic: Tests client_secret_basic authentication

Key changes:
- Generate EC P-256 keypair dynamically at test start (no hardcoded keys)
- Pass credentials to client via MCP_CONFORMANCE_CONTEXT environment variable
- Add context field to ScenarioUrls interface for scenario-specific data
- Update client runner to pass context as env var to spawned client process

The MCP_CONFORMANCE_CONTEXT env var contains a JSON object with:
- client_id: The expected client identifier
- private_key_pem: PEM-encoded private key (for JWT scenarios)
- client_secret: Client secret (for basic auth scenarios)
- signing_algorithm: JWT signing algorithm (defaults to ES256)

* Fix client-credentials scenarios for conformance testing

- Generate EC keypair with extractable: true so private key can be
  exported and passed to clients via MCP_CONFORMANCE_CONTEXT
- Fix client_secret_basic scenario to use authorizationHeader param
  instead of non-existent headers object

* Fix jose type import - use CryptoKey instead of KeyLike

* Add OAuth 2.1 section 4.2 spec reference to client credentials checks

Add OAUTH_2_1_CLIENT_CREDENTIALS spec reference pointing to OAuth 2.1
draft section 4.2 (Client Credentials Grant) and include it in all
client_credentials conformance checks for both JWT and basic auth flows.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add JWT iss claim verification for client credentials

Per RFC 7523, verify that the JWT issuer (iss) claim matches the
expected client_id, in addition to the existing sub claim check.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-25 20:07:05 +00:00
Paul Carleton
d303013e5d
[auth] Implement CIMD conformance test (#37)
* add cimd test and negative test

* Improve auth-test-no-cimd.ts documentation for clarity

Address review feedback: expanded comments to better explain what CIMD is,
why this client is non-compliant, and what behavior it's testing.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Remove .js extensions from relative imports

tsx doesn't require .js extensions for TypeScript imports.
Keeps .js for @modelcontextprotocol/sdk imports as those are external packages.

Also improves auth-test-no-cimd.ts documentation for clarity.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Skip auth/basic-cimd test until SDK support lands

Waiting on typescript-sdk PR #1127 for CIMD support.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix trailing whitespace in auth-test-no-cimd.ts

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-20 21:00:13 +00:00
Paul Carleton
5c151133bb
[auth] Scenarios for scope selection (#36)
* wip scope change

* rm useless bool

* fix-me: package changes for linking

* negative test

* negative test for multiple scopes

* fix displays of warnings

* wip step-up

* negative test for step up auth

* move warning into main request flow

* clean up more checks

* cleanup step-up scenario

* cleanup and simplify

* cleanup middleware

* inline negative tests

* inline the other test

* refactor logging and inlining for standalone execution too

* skip pending tests
2025-11-18 17:16:23 +00:00
Paul Carleton
f7c8c4460f
[scenario] authz metadata discovery tests: compatibility with 2025-03-26 spec, prm root, and www-authenticate (#28)
* clean up constructor calls for server lifecycle

* add back compat test

* fix dup logging, rm prm

* avoid fallbacks

* better error from example client

* add final endpoint method

* add test for OASM priority order

* s/prepack/prepare/ for npx

* try switching to .js

* make tsdown version happy default

* fix lock

* fix prmPath issue

* back to main package-lock

* fix bin path

* Add comprehensive auth scenario test suite

- Add index.test.ts to test all auth scenarios with auth-test.ts client
- Upgrade @modelcontextprotocol/sdk from 1.20.1 to 1.22.0
- All 5 auth scenarios now pass including auth/basic-metadata-var2

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* consolidate tests into index.test.ts

* rename metadata

* fix comments

* rework auth scenario listing

* add 3rd variation of metadata

* fix some type issues introduced by version bump

* add reusable spec references

* more refs

* fix up spec references

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-14 18:36:07 +00:00