conformance/.claude/skills/mcp-sdk-tier-audit/references/tier-requirements.md
Felix Weinberger 3f9048a019
feat: add specVersion classification to conformance scenarios (#147)
* feat: add specVersions classification to conformance scenarios

Each scenario declares which spec versions it applies to as a list.
Scenarios that carry forward (e.g. initialize) list all applicable versions
['2025-06-18', '2025-11-25']. Scenarios removed from newer specs (e.g.
backcompat auth) only list their original version ['2025-03-26'].

- specVersions list on Scenario and ClientScenario interfaces
- --spec-version CLI filter uses simple .includes()
- Tier-check conformance matrix (Server / Client: Core / Client: Auth)
  with per-version columns and unique All* count
- 7 unit tests for specVersions helpers
- Updated tier-audit skill docs with matrix format

* fix: fix console output template for tier audit skill

The template had an orphan table header (Check | Value | T2 | T1)
with no rows above the conformance matrix, causing an empty table
to render. The scorecard rows below the matrix also lacked their
own header.

Fix: two self-contained tables with clear labels — 'Conformance:'
for the per-version matrix, 'Scorecard:' for the check rows.

* fix: align skill console template with tier-check script output

Add asterisk footnote ('unique scenarios — a scenario may apply to
multiple spec versions') and rename 'Scorecard' to 'Repository Health'
to match the labels used by the tier-check CLI output.

* fix: add specVersions to CrossAppAccessCompleteFlowScenario

Added in 83c446d on main after this branch diverged.
2026-02-13 18:08:15 +00:00

8.1 KiB

SEP-1730: SDK Tier Requirements Reference

This is the authoritative reference table for MCP SDK tiering requirements, extracted from SEP-1730.

Source: modelcontextprotocol/docs/community/sdk-tiers.mdx in the spec repository

Full Requirements Table

Requirement Tier 1: Fully Supported Tier 2: Commitment to Full Support Tier 3: Experimental
Conformance Tests 100% pass rate >= 80% pass rate No minimum
New Protocol Features Before new spec version release, timeline agreed per release based on feature complexity Within 6 months No timeline commitment
Issue Triage Within 2 business days Within a month No requirement
Critical Bug Resolution Within 7 days Within two weeks No requirement
Stable Release Required with clear versioning At least one stable release Not required
Documentation Comprehensive with examples for all features Basic documentation covering core features No minimum
Dependency Policy Published update policy Published update policy Not required
Roadmap Published roadmap Published plan toward Tier 1 or explanation for remaining Tier 2 Not required

Exact Thresholds for Automated Checking

Metric Tier 1 Threshold Tier 2 Threshold How to Measure
Conformance pass rate == 100% >= 80% passed / (passed + failed) * 100 from conformance suite
Issue triage time <= 2 business days <= 1 month (30 calendar days) Time from issue creation to first label application
P0 resolution time <= 7 calendar days <= 14 calendar days Time from P0 label application to issue close
Stable release version >= 1.0.0, no pre-release suffix >= 1.0.0 (at least one) Check gh release list for version matching ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$ where major >= 1
Documentation coverage All non-experimental features documented with examples Core features documented Subagent evaluation
Dependency policy Published and findable in repo Published and findable in repo Subagent evaluation
Roadmap Published with concrete steps tracking spec components Published plan toward Tier 1 Subagent evaluation
Versioning policy Documented breaking change policy N/A (just needs stable release) Subagent evaluation

Conformance Score Calculation

Every scenario in the conformance suite has a specVersions field indicating which spec version it targets. The valid values are defined as the SpecVersion type (as a list) in src/types.ts — run node dist/index.js list to see the current mapping of scenarios to spec versions.

Date-versioned scenarios (e.g. 2025-06-18, 2025-11-25) count toward tier scoring. draft and extension scenarios are listed separately as informational.

The --spec-version CLI flag filters scenarios cumulatively for date versions (e.g. --spec-version 2025-06-18 includes 2025-03-26 + 2025-06-18). For draft/extension, it returns exact matches only.

The tier-check output includes a per-version pass rate breakdown alongside the aggregate.

Tier Relegation Rules

  • Tier 1 to Tier 2: Any conformance test fails continuously for 4 weeks
  • Tier 2 to Tier 3: More than 20% of conformance tests fail continuously for 4 weeks

Issue Triage Label Taxonomy

SDK repositories must use these consistent labels to enable automated reporting.

Type Labels (pick one)

Label Description
bug Something isn't working
enhancement Request for new feature
question Further information requested

Note: Repositories using GitHub's native issue types satisfy this requirement without needing type labels.

Status Labels (pick one)

Label Description
needs confirmation Unclear if still relevant
needs repro Insufficient information to reproduce
ready for work Has enough information to start
good first issue Good for newcomers
help wanted Contributions welcome from those familiar with codebase

Priority Labels (only if actionable)

Label Description
P0 Critical: core functionality failures or high-severity security
P1 Significant bug affecting many users
P2 Moderate issues, valuable feature requests
P3 Nice to haves, rare edge cases

Total: 12 labels (3 type + 5 status + 4 priority)

Key Definitions

Issue Triage

Labeling and determining whether an issue is valid. This is NOT the same as resolving the issue. An issue is considered triaged when it receives its first label.

Critical Bug (P0)

  • Security vulnerabilities with CVSS score >= 7.0 (High or Critical severity)
  • Core functionality failures that prevent basic MCP operations: connection establishment, message exchange, or use of core primitives (tools, resources, prompts)

Stable Release

A published version explicitly marked as production-ready. Specifically: version 1.0.0 or higher without pre-release identifiers like -alpha, -beta, or -rc.

Clear Versioning

Following idiomatic versioning patterns with documented breaking change policies, so users can understand compatibility expectations when upgrading.

Roadmap

Outlines concrete steps and work items that track implementation of required MCP specification components (non-experimental features and optional capabilities), giving users visibility into upcoming feature support.