* Add Security docs section, SEO improvements, and doc site enhancements - Add Authorization guide covering per-server and per-tool OAuth patterns - Add CSP & CORS guide extracted from Patterns doc - Group both under a new Security section in the documentation nav - Replace CSP & CORS section in Patterns with cross-reference to new guide - Rename doc site title from package name to 'MCP Apps' - Rename 'Modules' nav section to 'API Documentation' - Ensure Security section appears before API Documentation in TOC - Add SEO plugin with JSON-LD structured data (TechArticle/WebPage) - Add per-page meta descriptions from frontmatter - Add description frontmatter to all documentation pages - Add hostedBaseUrl for sitemap.xml generation and canonical URLs - Normalize document page slugs to lowercase hyphenated format - Update compressed navigation and search index data to match new slugs * Add favicons with light/dark mode support - Download favicons from modelcontextprotocol.io (light + dark variants) - Inject favicon link tags into every page with correct relative paths - Support prefers-color-scheme media queries for light/dark mode - Include apple-touch-icon for iOS - Copy favicon assets to output directory during doc build * Fix HTML sanitization in SEO plugin with proper parser Replace regex-based HTML tag stripping with htmlparser2 for extracting plain-text descriptions from rendered pages. * Add custom theme to align with modelcontextprotocol.io styling - Import Inter and JetBrains Mono fonts (matching MCP site) - Override light mode colors: pure white backgrounds, softer gray borders - Override dark mode colors: match MCP site dark background (#0f1117) - Taller header (3.5rem) with backdrop-blur frosted glass effect - Sidebar: adjusted spacing, font size, and hover/active states - Content: increased line-height (1.6), more heading breathing room - Code blocks: JetBrains Mono, subtle border, more padding - Fix CSS load order: custom.css now loads after theme stylesheets * Align sidebar nav styling with modelcontextprotocol.io - Active item: tinted blue background with blue text (matching MCP's primary-color tinted active state) - Non-active items: muted gray text, subtle hover background - Larger border-radius (0.75rem/rounded-xl) matching MCP sidebar - Group headers: semibold with slight letter spacing - Proper dark mode variants for all states * Fix sidebar active item: dark gray background with bold text * Make sidebar active item more prominent: bolder weight, stronger background * Highlight current page in sidebar nav, normalize code font size Inject a small script via the SEO plugin that marks the active sidebar link with a "current" class (TypeDoc doesn't do this natively for document pages). Uses a MutationObserver since the sidebar is populated asynchronously. Pathname comparison strips .html extensions to support clean-URL servers. Also bumps code/pre font-size from 0.85em to 1em so code snippets match the surrounding body text size. * Split styling into dedicated plugin, fix auth terminology, improve breadcrumbs Extract CSS cascade fix, breadcrumb labels, and sidebar nav highlighting from the SEO plugin into a new typedoc-plugin-mcpstyle.mjs to keep concerns separated. Fix authorization doc: use "authorization" consistently instead of mixing with "authentication", link to MCP spec and RFC 9728 for Protected Resource Metadata, remove redundant spec link paragraph. Rename "Documents" nav section to "Getting Started" and add explicit group frontmatter to all doc pages. Breadcrumbs now show the section name instead of duplicating the page title.
11 KiB
| title | group | description |
|---|---|---|
| Authorization | Security | Learn how to protect MCP App tools with OAuth authorization, including per-server and per-tool auth patterns, token verification, and UI-initiated auth escalation. |
Authorization
MCP Apps can protect tools behind OAuth-based authorization, as defined in the MCP specification. There are two approaches:
- Per-server authorization — The entire MCP server requires authorization at connection time. Every request must include a valid token, regardless of which tool is being called. This is the simpler model when all tools are sensitive.
- Per-tool authorization — Only specific tools require authorization. Public tools work without a token, and the OAuth flow is triggered only when the user calls a protected tool. This lets you mix public and protected tools in the same server.
Shared setup
Regardless of which approach you choose, you need OAuth discovery metadata and token verification. These are the same for both.
OAuth discovery metadata
The MCP specification requires servers to implement authorization server discovery so clients know how to obtain authorization. Two well-known endpoints are needed:
Protected Resource Metadata (/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource) — describes the resource server and identifies which authorization server(s) can issue tokens for it. The MCP SDK's mcpAuthRouter handles this automatically.
Authorization Server Metadata (/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server) — advertises the authorization and token endpoints, supported scopes, and whether Client ID Metadata Documents (CIMD) is supported:
app.get("/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server", (_req, res) => {
res.json({
...oauthMetadata,
client_id_metadata_document_supported: true,
});
});
Setting client_id_metadata_document_supported: true tells MCP clients to use CIMD instead of Dynamic Client Registration (DCR). With CIMD, the client_id is a URL that serves the client's metadata document, removing the need for a registration endpoint. See Client Registration Approaches in the spec for the full list of options and priority order.
Token verification
Verify access tokens as JWTs against the identity provider's JWKS endpoint. The jose library handles key fetching and caching:
import { createRemoteJWKSet, jwtVerify } from "jose";
const JWKS = createRemoteJWKSet(new URL(`${IDP_DOMAIN}/.well-known/jwks.json`));
const { payload } = await jwtVerify(token, JWKS, {
issuer: IDP_DOMAIN,
});
MCP servers must validate that tokens were issued specifically for them — see Token Handling and Access Token Privilege Restriction in the spec for the full requirements.
Per-server authorization
With per-server authorization, every request to the /mcp endpoint must include a valid Bearer token. Any unauthorized request receives HTTP 401, and the host must complete the OAuth flow before the client can use any tools. This is the right choice when all tools are sensitive and there's no value in allowing unauthorized access.
The TypeScript MCP SDK supports this out of the box via mcpAuthRouter and ProxyOAuthServerProvider — no custom HTTP handler logic is needed. See the MCP SDK documentation for setup details.
Per-tool authorization
With per-tool authorization, the /mcp endpoint handler inspects the raw JSON-RPC request body, checks whether any message targets a protected tool, and only enforces authorization for those calls. Public tools pass through without a token.
How it works
- The server maintains a set of tool names that require authorization
- When a JSON-RPC request arrives at the
/mcpendpoint, the server inspects the request body to determine if any message is atools/calltargeting a protected tool - If a protected tool is being called and no valid Bearer token is present, the server returns HTTP
401with aWWW-Authenticateheader pointing to its Protected Resource Metadata - The MCP host (e.g., Claude Desktop) sees the
401, discovers the authorization server via the metadata URL, runs the OAuth flow with the user, and retries the request with the acquired token - On retry, the server verifies the token, extracts the user identity, and creates a per-request MCP server instance with that auth context
- Unprotected tools pass through without any token check — they work for everyone
This design means authorization is enforced at the HTTP boundary (as required by the spec), not as a tool-level error. The MCP server itself never sees unauthorized requests for protected tools.
Enforcing HTTP 401
The MCP auth specification requires protected resources to return HTTP 401 responses — not tool-level errors.
Start by defining which tools require authorization. Then, in the /mcp endpoint handler, inspect the raw JSON-RPC request body, check whether any message targets a protected tool, and either verify the Bearer token or return 401 before the request ever reaches the MCP server:
/** Tools that require a valid Bearer token — checked at the HTTP level for proper 401. */
const PROTECTED_TOOLS = new Set(["get_account_balance", "manage_branch_admin"]);
app.all("/mcp", async (req, res) => {
// Parse the JSON-RPC body — it may be a single message or a batch
const messages = Array.isArray(req.body) ? req.body : [req.body];
// Check if any message is a tools/call for a protected tool
const needsAuth = messages.some(
(msg: any) =>
msg?.method === "tools/call" && PROTECTED_TOOLS.has(msg.params?.name),
);
// Extract and verify the Bearer token
let authInfo: AuthInfo | undefined;
const authHeader = req.headers.authorization;
if (authHeader?.startsWith("Bearer ")) {
try {
const token = authHeader.slice(7);
const { payload } = await jwtVerify(token, JWKS, {
issuer: IDP_DOMAIN,
});
authInfo = { token, sub: payload.sub as string };
} catch {
if (needsAuth) {
return res
.status(401)
.set(
"WWW-Authenticate",
`Bearer resource_metadata="${resourceMetadataUrl}"`,
)
.json({
error: "invalid_token",
error_description: "The access token is invalid",
});
}
}
} else if (needsAuth) {
return res
.status(401)
.set(
"WWW-Authenticate",
`Bearer resource_metadata="${resourceMetadataUrl}"`,
)
.json({
error: "invalid_token",
error_description: "Authorization required",
});
}
// Create a per-request MCP server with the auth context.
// authInfo is undefined for public tool calls, populated for
// authenticated requests — tool handlers use it to scope data
// to the authenticated user.
const server = createServer(authInfo);
// ... handle the request with transport
});
The WWW-Authenticate header includes the Protected Resource Metadata URL, which tells the client where to discover the authorization server.
Defence-in-depth in tool handlers
Even though the HTTP layer enforces authorization, protected tool handlers should also verify authInfo as a defence-in-depth measure. If the HTTP layer is misconfigured or bypassed, the tool handler catches unauthorized access:
registerAppTool(
server,
"get_account_balance",
{
description: "Get account balance",
inputSchema: { accountId: z.string() },
},
async ({ accountId }) => {
if (!authInfo) {
return {
isError: true,
content: [
{
type: "text",
text: "Authorization required to access account data.",
},
],
};
}
const balance = await getBalance(authInfo.sub, accountId);
return {
content: [{ type: "text", text: `Balance: ${balance}` }],
};
},
);
UI-initiated auth escalation
A powerful pattern is mixing public and protected tools in the same app. The app loads with public data (no authorization required), and the OAuth flow is triggered only when the user performs a protected action. This is a practical application of the step-up authorization flow described in the spec:
- A public tool (e.g.,
manage_branch) loads the UI without requiring authorization - The user clicks a button that calls a protected tool via
app.callServerTool() - The MCP host receives HTTP
401and automatically runs the OAuth flow - After the user completes the OAuth flow, the host retries the tool call with the acquired token
- The protected data appears in the UI
function BranchItem({ branch }: { branch: Branch }) {
const [adminData, setAdminData] = useState(null);
async function handleManage() {
// This call may trigger the OAuth flow if the user
// hasn't been authorized yet — the host handles it
// transparently.
const result = await app.callServerTool({
name: "manage_branch_admin",
arguments: { branch_id: branch.id },
});
setAdminData(result.structuredContent);
}
return (
<div>
<span>{branch.name}</span>
<button onClick={handleManage}>Manage</button>
{adminData && <AdminPanel data={adminData} />}
</div>
);
}
This pattern keeps the initial experience fast (no login wall) while securing sensitive operations behind authorization. The host manages the entire OAuth flow — the app code simply calls the tool and handles the result.