Add example/server/toolschemas, which demonstrates various ways to
customize tool schemas, and illustrates the differences between
ToolHandler and ToolHandlerFor.
Fixes#385Fixes#386
For #368
Update examples/server/rate-limiting to use the same replace directive
strategy as the auth-middleware example, and fix the breakages.
Also remove the unneeded type parameters in examples/client/middleware.
During initialization, the default logging level is set to info allowing
servers to emit logs immediately without waiting for a client to set a
log level.
The updated example shows how to send a notification in the context of
the request.
Fixes#387
Log the result of a tool call in the middleware.
This example now fully demonstrates that receiving middleware can
effectively wrap a ToolHandler. That means that one reason for ToolFor
is moot: you don't need to get your hands on the returned ToolHandler in
order to wrap it.
This commit introduces a new example demonstrating the integration of
authentication middleware with an MCP server. The server supports both
JWT token and API key authentication, along with scope-based access
control for various MCP tools. Key features include token generation
endpoints, in-memory API key storage, and a health check endpoint.
New files added:
- `main.go`: Implements the MCP server and authentication logic.
- `go.mod` and `go.sum`: Manage dependencies for the project.
- `README.md`: Provides setup instructions, available endpoints, and
example usage.
This example serves as a reference for implementing secure access to MCP
tools.
Fixes#330
Our 'hello' example should be as simple as possible. On the other hand,
we should have an 'everything' example that exercises (almost)
everything we offer.
Using the everything example, I did some final testing using the
inspector. This turned up a couple rough edges related to JSON null that
I addressed by preferring empty slices.
For #33
Replace all occurrences of ServerRequest[*CallToolParams] and other
concrete instantiations with CallToolRequest and the like.
Make the XXXRequest types aliases, to preserve the convenience of
generics for the internal machinery (see shared.go, for example.)
I will expand the aliases in a followup PR.
Change the design of tool handlers by removing genericity from the common path.
- `ToolHandler` gets the args as a `json.RawMessage`. Using Server.AddTool does no unmarshaling or schema validation.
- `ToolHandlerFor`, installed with `AddTool`, are the only generic pieces.
TODO:
uncomment and fix some tests
Handlers and client/server methods take a single request argument
combining the session and params. This slightly simplifies the signature
for handlers, since there is no longer an often-ignored session
argument.
But more importantly, it opens the door to adding more information in
requests, such as auth info and HTTP request headers.
For #243.
As described in #272, there is really no reason for transports to be
closed structs with constructors, since their state must be established
by a call to Connect. Making them open structs simplifies their APIs,
and means that all transports can be extended in the future: we don't
have to create empty Options structs just for the purpose of future
compatibility.
For now, the related constructors and options structs are simply
deprecated (with go:fix directives where possible). A future CL will
remove them prior to the v1.0.0 release.
For #272
Support stateless streamable sessions by adding a GetSessionID function
to StreamableHTTPOptions. If GetSessionID returns "", the session is
stateless, and no validation is performed. This is implemented by
providing the session a trivial initialization state.
To implement this, some parts of #232 (distributed sessions) are copied
over, since they add an API for creating an already-initialized session.
In total, the following new API is added:
- StreamableHTTPOptions.GetSessionID
- ServerSessionOptions (a new parameter to Server.Connect)
- ServerSessionState
- ClientSessionOptions (a new parameter to Client.Connect, for symmetry)
For #10
Add a client example that lists all features on a stdio server. Since
this is our first client example, organize examples by client / server
-- otherwise it is too difficult to find client examples.
For #33
Add example of implementing mcp on [sequentialthinking
server](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/tree/main/src/sequentialthinking),
from [Example Servers](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/examples).
The PR includes dynamic and reflective problem-solving through
structured thinking processes.
The server provides tools for:
- starting thinking sessions
- adding sequential thoughts with step tracking
- revising previous thoughts
- creating alternative reasoning branches
- reviewing complete processes.
Also, features include thread-safe session management, adaptive planning
that adjusts step counts dynamically.
Expose `jsonrpc2.MakeID`, `jsonrpc2.EncodeMessage` and
`jsonrpc2.DecodeMessage` functions to allow implementing custom
`mcp.Transport`.
Add an example that demonstrates a custom transport
implementation.
Fixes#110.
BREAKING CHANGE
Change the API for adding tools, prompts, resources and resource
templates to a server.
The ServerXXX types are gone along with the plural Add methods
(AddTools, AddPrompts etc.)
Instead there are single Add methods (AddTool, AddPrompt).
In addition, instead of NewServerTool, there is AddTool[In, Out].
Fixes#73.
This CL implements a completion handler for the server and a complete
method for the client.
Fixes: #12
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes -->
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
This adds support for completion.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
Added tests and an example.
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
N/A
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [ ] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
I added an example for how rate limiting should be implemented using
middleware.
Fixes#22
## Motivation and Context
<!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? -->
Rate limiting can be enabled using middleware. This adds an example on
how to do that.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were
tested? -->
N/A
## Breaking Changes
<!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? -->
No
## Types of changes
<!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all
the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
- [x] Documentation update
## Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have read the [MCP
Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io)
- [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines
- [x] New and existing tests pass locally
- [x] I have added appropriate error handling
- [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed
## Additional context
<!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions
-->
After some experience with the flattened version of Content, we see that
it can easily lead to incorrect usage and is a harder API to read.
Therefore, this CL changes back to a design similar to what we had prior
to https://go.dev/cl/672415, though opting to promote content
unmarshalling to the protocol types that use it, which leads to an
overall simpler api.
* mcp: move to 2025-06-18 schema
Add types and fields for the latest MCP schema.
The main challenge here was dealing with the presence of _meta fields
on many types, like Tool, Prompt and Resource.
- Distinguish between the _meta field of a request's params, which
includes a progress token, from the _meta field on other types,
which is simply a map.
- Redefine GetMeta to return a pointer to the map. We wanted to avoid
that, but I don't see a clean way to do so. An alternative would be
to have GetMeta return a map, and SetMeta to set it.
- Provide GetProgressToken for requests only (not notifications or other
types).
- Still to do: deal with the meta and annotation fields of ContentBlock,
which are currently duplicated for Resource and ResourceContents.
* Meta and progress token redesign
In CL 682976, Alan Donovan correctly points out that the term in the MCP
spec is 'stdio', and therefore the correct capitalization is Stdio.
Change-Id: Ib5bbe04f1a61de886298b4d0adc13aefd6aadd9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/683075
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Remove NewServerPrompt.
Schema inference is irrelevant for prompts.
All arguments are strings.
So using a struct is not as valuable as with tools.
The only advantage is catching misspellings at compile time.
It's not worth it.
Change-Id: I45aaa5d55c8940cc9e32dc277bd543f79d932519
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682797
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The hello example was using params.Name, which is the name of the
prompt. It should use args.Name.
Change-Id: I0e7e992bbe312fd5a6e56e9bc46a931f0eeb423c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682416
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Thanawalla <samthanawalla@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The NewTool and NewPrompt constructors were unidiomatic, because they
returned a ServerTool and ServerPrompt, respectively, rather than a Tool
and Prompt. Rename to be consistent with the constructed object name.
Change-Id: Ife3f16f783368401f792660c4272e1bb5ae61638
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/682375
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
Add an (almost) complete implementation of the streamable HTTP
transport, including:
- A StreamableHTTPHandler for serving sessions.
- A StreamableHTTPServerTransport that supports session resumption.
- A minimal StreamableHTTPClientTransport.
Additionally, include the following minor changes:
- Refactor SSE event reading to use an iterator.
- Start to to aliases for JSON-RPC types (incomplete)
- Fix handling for null tool arguments (again)
Still to do:
- The streamable client does not support retry/resumption, or the
side-channel GET requests.
- Support configurable session and event retention (garbage collection).
- Expose the HTTP client used for HTTP requests (for auth).
Change-Id: Ieba216ef901169b4660d601386fa0c7c7bb4c4b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/667515
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
