- The recovery text told users to move the endpoint to `::1`. A bare IPv6
literal is not a legal URL host — `new URL("http://::1/token")` throws — so
anyone copying that into the Token URL override got a parse error from advice
meant to unblock them. Now `[::1]`, in both the notice and the manual
reproduction guide.
The exemption list still reads `::1`, because that is the host the SDK
compares; only the remedy is bracketed, because that is what a user types.
The comment says so, so neither gets "corrected" into the other.
- Dropped SEP-2207 from all nine files it had reached. I took the label from
the SDK's own source comments, which attribute this check to it — but this
repo already uses SEP-2207 for OIDC refresh / offline_access
(specification/v2_auth_hardening.md, plus an e2e test), so grepping it here
would have turned up two unrelated things. Replaced with plain description
rather than a different SEP number: having guessed wrong once, guessing again
is not the fix.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018MvNbmAtQuWhDvzi4yXDju
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Both are accuracy defects in the one message whose entire job is to be
actionable, so both matter more than their size.
- "before any credentials were sent" is FALSE on the mid-session refresh and
re-authentication paths this same notice serves, where credentials were
legitimately sent earlier in the session. A user connected for an hour would
read it as describing some other failure. Now scoped to the request actually
refused: "without sending this request".
- The recovery guidance named "Server Settings → Authorization". The UI renders
that accordion as "OAuth Settings" and the field as "Token URL override"
(ServerSettingsForm.tsx), so the message directed people to a section that
does not exist, precisely when it was asking them to go reconfigure
something.
Both pinned by tests, including negative assertions on the old wording so it
cannot drift back.
The round's third finding was against test-server-http.ts's strictPort
precondition, which no longer exists — that option was dropped in 6c1b532,
after the review ran.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018MvNbmAtQuWhDvzi4yXDju
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Closes#2280
InsecureTokenEndpointError appeared nowhere in our source, so it fell through
to the generic auth-failure path and rendered a "Re-authentication required"
banner with a Re-authenticate button. That button can never work: the SDK's
assertSecureTokenEndpoint runs inside executeTokenRequest, the error does not
extend OAuthError, and auth() special-cases it to rethrow rather than start a
fresh /authorize redirect. Clicking re-ran the same flow to the same refusal,
under the raw SDK message, which names the three exempt host literals and
nothing actionable. A terminal configuration error was being presented as a
retryable auth error.
Not specific to *.localhost: it fires for any endpoint outside the SDK's
exemption — host.docker.internal (#1911), a LAN hostname, a reverse-proxy
name, a mistyped scheme.
It is now recognized (core/auth/insecureTokenEndpoint.ts, mirroring
issuerBinding.ts's brand-plus-name classifier and walking cause / data.cause,
since era negotiation and the transport wrappers bury the rejection) and
surfaced as the configuration error it is, naming the endpoint and both ways
out, with no action affordance.
Six paths reach the refusal and all six classify it — the connect handshake,
authenticate() during connect, the satisfied-challenge connect retry, the
post-redirect callback, the command/background path, the deferred tab-visible
resume (which re-armed on every focus, an unbounded loop on a terminal error),
and the banner action. They share one wrapper so a seventh cannot omit the
banner clear, and every clear is scoped to its own serverId: these paths are
asynchronous, so a late continuation for one server must not erase a banner
another raised in the meantime.
Adds oauth-insecure-token-endpoint-http.json to reproduce it, whose issuer is
http://localhost.:8091 — the root-anchored spelling every resolver sends to
loopback but which is none of the SDK's exempt literals. transport.strictPort
keeps that fixture honest, since its port is hard-coded inside the issuer.
Making such an endpoint work has to land in the SDK (typescript-sdk#2591);
this changes the reporting, not the outcome.
Split out of #2282, where it was tangled with the *.localhost origin work for
#1944 — a separate question the reporter is still clarifying.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018MvNbmAtQuWhDvzi4yXDju
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Copilot round 3, four items:
- the snapshot "attempt token" was the stored serialization, which is not
unique: the snapshot records neither the authorization URL nor its
`state`, so two concurrent redirects for one server with unchanged UI
serialize identically. `OAuthResumeSnapshot` now carries an optional
`attemptId`, stamped per write and matched on clear. Optional because
an older build's snapshot, mid-redirect across an upgrade, has none —
and treating that as a match would strand a live callback.
- the resume-failure toast promised a retry even when the session had
ended and nothing was restored. Copy is now chosen by whether anything
is left pending; `authRecoveryAbandonedMessage` covers the other case.
- a connect-scoped redirect that failed left the connection at
"connecting" with the active-server lock held, since the redirect was
what would have ended the attempt. It now disconnects first, as the
sibling arm in `useConnectionLifecycle` does — scoped to that context,
because an ambient or step-up failure does not mean the session is dead.
- both terminal EMA step-up failure arms now drop the stored retry. A
later step-up does not overwrite the ref, so a retained operation could
be re-run by an unrelated authorization. The `interactive` arm keeps
it: that one is still on its way to a redirect.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Quk1hBUtyhkXowwMXzAnAY
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
Each of the five sites in `useOAuthRecovery` discarded a promise with
`void`, satisfying `@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises` but not the
narrower rule AGENTS.md states — `void` only where the callee owns its
failures or the caller cannot await, with a comment saying which.
Each now picks a user-visible outcome:
- `prepareOAuthRedirect` clears the resume snapshot (so the next load
cannot read a redirect that never started as an *abandoned* one),
flags the server and raises the re-auth banner.
- the `authChallengeInteractive` handler flags and banners, where before
a rejection drew no UI response at all.
- `resumePendingReauth` restores the pending slot and toasts, so the
next trigger retries the deferred recovery instead of losing it.
- the `/oauth/callback` effect flags and banners what falls between its
existing arms — the client rebuild and the post-resume scope check.
- `handleStepUpAuthorize`'s EMA branch reports exactly as its `failed`
outcome arm does; the stored retry gets its own catch, since by then
the permissions leg succeeded and the failure is the command's.
The two surviving `void`s carry the justification AGENTS.md asks for.
Closes#2165
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Quk1hBUtyhkXowwMXzAnAY
Signed-off-by: cliffhall <cliff@futurescale.com>
* fix(auth): offer explicit re-authorize when callback state is lost (#1808)
A `/oauth/callback` that arrives with no recorded SEP-2352 discovery state
made the SDK throw `AuthorizationServerMismatchError` and the Inspector
dead-ended, surfacing the raw SDK text with no path forward.
The SDK folds two very different failures into that one error class, so
`core/auth/issuerBinding.ts` classifies them structurally: a recoverable
"lost authorization state" (the SDK puts prose, not an issuer URL, in the
`recordedIssuer` slot) versus a genuine cross-AS `issuer_mismatch`. Only
the first gets a recovery affordance.
Web: the callback failure now raises a dedicated banner ("Authorization
state was lost" / "Authorize again") whose action clears the stale OAuth
state for that server and starts a fresh authorization. A genuine
mismatch stays a red, non-dismissible security notification with both
issuers named and no one-click retry.
Node runners (CLI/TUI): the same classification rewrites the callback
rejection into the shared actionable copy instead of the SDK text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016S7h83UKNQ7kvSiFDNksCt
* fix(auth): detect the SDK mismatch error via isInstance (#1808)
The callback-leg classifier gated on `err.mcpBrand`, but the SDK declares
that brand in a `static {}` block, so it lives on the constructor and is
never reachable from an instance. The predicate always returned false, so
`findIssuerBindingFailure()` never matched and the #1808 recovery banner
was inert in production — the callback dead-ended exactly as before.
Use the SDK's own `AuthorizationServerMismatchError.isInstance()`, which is
cross-copy safe by construction (it consults a `Symbol.for()`-keyed brand
set), with a `name` fallback for a serialization boundary. Correct the
module doc, which cited cross-bundle safety as the reason to avoid
`instanceof` — the very thing the SDK's branded `hasInstance` provides.
Every fixture now constructs a real `AuthorizationServerMismatchError`
instead of a hand-rolled object with an own `mcpBrand`, which is why a
green `npm run ci` hid this. Adds a test pinning the brand's placement so
the feature cannot silently go inert again.
Review follow-ups: drop the unused `isLostAuthorizationStateError`, remove
the duplicated banner title default, resolve the banner title/action label
where the banner is raised, keep the clear-failure notification open, and
bound remote-supplied issuers in user-facing copy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016S7h83UKNQ7kvSiFDNksCt
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
