| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8759d9d8c0 |
ci: bump golangci-lint to v2.13.1 to fix panic on Go 1.27 (#1561)
CI is red on `main` and on every open PR (including the Dependabot PRs #1531, #1552–#1554) with: ``` panic: file requires newer Go version go1.27 (application built with go1.26) golangci-lint exit with code 2 ``` ## Cause `actions/setup-go` with `go-version: 'stable'` started resolving to **go1.27.0**. The pinned golangci-lint **v2.11.4** release binary is built with **go1.26**, and its `go/types` refuses to typecheck source files declaring a newer language version. Nothing in the failing PRs is at fault. ## Fix Bump to **golangci-lint v2.13.1**, whose release binaries are built with go1.27, so linting works under `stable` again. That bump also pulls in newer linter versions, which surface 57 findings this tree did not have before. Handled as follows: | Linter | Count | Resolution | |---|---|---| | `goconst` | 50 | 39 were repeated literals in `_test.go` files — goconst started counting those in v2.12.0 (golangci-lint#6480 exposed `ignore-tests`). Fixture data like `"1.0.0"` (89 occurrences) is not a missing constant, so `goconst.ignore-tests: true`. The other 11 were real duplication in production code (OpenAPI tags, the `bearer` security scheme name, `$ref`, `http`/`https`) and became named constants. | | `gosec` G710 | 1 | **True positive, fixed.** See below. | | `staticcheck` SA1019 | 6 | Go 1.26 deprecated `ecdsa.PublicKey.X/Y` and `PrivateKey.D`. Annotated with the same targeted `nolint` + rationale already used for `ScalarBaseMult` in `cmd/publisher/auth/common.go`. | ### The open redirect is real `TrailingSlashMiddleware` copied the entire `*url.URL` before rewriting the path. For an absolute-form request URI — legal for a Go HTTP server to parse, e.g. `GET http://evil.com/foo/ HTTP/1.1` — `r.URL.Scheme` and `r.URL.Host` are populated, and they were echoed straight back in the `Location` header. The redirect target is now built from the cleaned path and query alone. The existing `path.Clean` hardening for GHSA-v8vw-gw5j-w7m6 (protocol-relative `//evil.com/`) is unchanged. ### Also Switched `gomodguard` → `gomodguard_v2`; the former is deprecated as of v2.12.0 and was emitting a warning on every run. ## Verification - `golangci-lint v2.13.1` against this tree: **0 issues**, no deprecation warnings - `make validate`: all validations passed - `go build ./...` and tests for every touched package pass (DB-backed tests need Postgres; left to CI) ## Note on migrating the ecdsa key paths Moving those six sites to `PublicKey.Bytes` / `ParseUncompressedPublicKey` / `crypto/ecdh` touches key parsing and signature verification. It should be its own reviewed PR rather than riding along on a CI unblock. Happy to open one. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
9e762b03c7 |
docs(auth): document fine-grained PAT permission for org publishing (+ pagination-cap test) (#1435)
Follow-up to #1383, surfaced while validating that change end-to-end against staging. ## Why #1383 hardened org-namespace publishing to require Owner (`admin`) role, read via `GET /user/memberships/orgs`. Validating on staging revealed a gap: the docs only mention the classic `read:org` scope, but a **fine-grained PAT** (GitHub's recommended token type) needs a *different* permission to expose org membership. Without it, GitHub returns no org memberships for the token, so the exchange silently grants only the personal namespace — with no hint why org publishing "doesn't work." This is **not** a code bug (the behavior is fail-closed and correct given GitHub's response); it's a documentation/UX gap. ## What - **Docs** (`authentication.mdx`, `github-actions.mdx`): spell out both token types — - Classic PAT → `read:org` scope - Fine-grained PAT → **Organization permissions → Members → Read-only** (the equivalent), noting a fine-grained PAT is bound to a single resource owner. - Also clarified `read:user` is not required. - **Test** (`github_at_test.go`): cover the `maxOrgMembershipPages` pagination cap — when every page is full, the exchange **fails closed** (no token) rather than returning a possibly-truncated org grant. This path was previously untested. - **Comment** (`github_at.go`): qualify the `X-GitHub-SSO` 403 check as best-effort — we have not confirmed the memberships *list* endpoint emits that header on SSO enforcement (it may just omit the org). The check is safe either way, but the comment no longer overstates it as a guarantee. ## Verification (live, against staging) Confirmed by exchanging real tokens for `rdimitrov` on `staging.registry.modelcontextprotocol.io`: - **Classic `read:org` PAT** across 16 real org memberships → the JWT granted exactly the 8 **admin** orgs + personal namespace, and **zero** of the 8 **member** orgs (incl. `stacklok`, `modelcontextprotocol`) — the core #1383 behavior, working. - **Fine-grained PAT**: without Members:read → personal namespace only (fail-closed); after adding Members:read → the org (Owner) namespace is granted. This is what the new docs describe. No runtime behavior change here beyond the added test; the docs and comment are the substance. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
2bc37b1999 |
fix(auth): grant org namespace only to org Owners, not all members (#1383)
## The bug (scoped to `github-at`)
When you exchange a GitHub OAuth/PAT token for a registry JWT, the
handler granted `io.github.<org>/*` publish permission for **every**
organization you belong to. It derived that list from [`GET
/users/{username}/orgs`](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/orgs/orgs#list-organizations-for-a-user),
which:
1. returns only **public** org memberships, and
2. carries **no role** — an org Owner and a brand-new member look
identical.
So membership was silently treated as publishing authority. Anyone who
is (or whose public membership lists them as) a member of `acme` could
publish — and, because publish is a pure namespace-glob with no
per-server ownership check, **overwrite** — any server under
`io.github.acme/*`.
## The fix
Switch to [`GET
/user/memberships/orgs`](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/orgs/members#list-organization-memberships-for-the-authenticated-user),
which returns the **authenticated caller's role** per org (and includes
private memberships), and grant the org namespace only when the role is
`admin` (org Owner).
- **Personal namespaces are unchanged** — you always get
`io.github.<your-username>/*`.
- **Org namespaces now require Owner.** GitHub has no org-level
"maintainer" role; org membership is either `admin` (Owner) or `member`.
We grant only on `admin`.
- **`read:org` is the only scope needed.** A minimal token without it
still authenticates and still publishes to your personal namespace; a
genuine missing-scope `403` from the memberships call is treated as "no
admin orgs" rather than a hard failure, so we don't push anyone to
over-scope a token. A `403`/`429` that is actually a rate limit
(`X-RateLimit-Remaining: 0` / `Retry-After`) fails closed instead, so a
throttle can't silently strip a real Owner's org grant. Critically, the
token needs **no repository scopes** — the registry never reads or
writes code, so an org Owner can hand CI a near-powerless `read:org`
token.
The authorization decision stays stateless and delegated to GitHub — no
new storage, no new endpoints, no schema changes — consistent with
[design principle #2](docs/design/design-principles.md) (minimal
operational burden).
### Containing the CI token
The registry-side change makes the org Owner the only one who can mint
org-namespace authority. But if that Owner drops the resulting PAT into
a plain repo secret, **every repository writer** can reach it (via
branch/tag pushes that run repo-controlled build/test code in the
privileged job) — quietly re-widening publish access beyond Owners.
External fork contributors still cannot reach it by default (no secrets
on fork PRs, no branch push), barring misconfigurations like
`pull_request_target`-with-checkout or self-hosted runners on public
repos.
`docs/modelcontextprotocol-io/github-actions.mdx` documents how to
contain that blast radius:
- store the token as a **GitHub Actions Environment secret** (the PAT
example uses `environment:`),
- restrict that environment to the default branch / release tags and
require PR reviews on it, so only reviewed, maintainer-approved code can
reach the token,
- optionally add a **required environment reviewer** for explicit
per-publish approval,
- and avoid the two footguns (`pull_request_target` checkout,
self-hosted runners on public repos).
This shrinks *who holds* the org credential; it does not change the fact
that an authorized publish can still overwrite a different server in the
same namespace until per-server publisher ownership exists (the
follow-up noted below).
## Why this shape, given the alternatives
[Pree's
writeup](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/982#issuecomment-3982959559)
([Notion analysis
doc](https://www.notion.so/MCP-Registry-Authorization-Model-Analysis-Issue-982-31736f79f74980bc90c6e53de1c564c5))
is the clearest framing of the problem and the option space, laying out
three broad solutions:
- **Approach A — GitHub App as the authority layer.** Strong model, but
its natural unit of authority is a *repo*, so it needs a repo→server
mapping to authorize a namespace. The safe, flexible version of that
mapping is registry-managed state — which collapses into Approach B.
It's also GitHub-only.
- **Approach B — a registry-managed grants table** (OIDC bootstrap, or
device-flow admin check). The most capable and provider-agnostic option,
and probably where v1 wants to go. But it introduces exactly the
"registry manages an authorization database" layer we wanted to avoid
taking on right now: revocation, sync, audit, migration.
- **Approach C — scoped bearer tokens (npm-style).** Good ergonomics,
but again implies issuance/storage the registry would own.
The two-property test (does the registry control the decision? is it
granted through an act requiring real authority?) is the right lens.
This change satisfies it **without** new state: the registry makes the
decision (it filters on role), and the authority is real (live GitHub
Owner role, re-checked on every short-lived token exchange).
**What this deliberately gives up**, so reviewers can weigh it honestly:
- **Owners are always in the loop.** Only org Owners can publish org
servers; there's no delegated "this team can publish this server" — that
needs Approach B's state. Reduced flexibility in exchange for zero new
infrastructure.
- **Blast radius within an org is unchanged.** An Owner (or Owner-scoped
CI token) can still overwrite *any* server under the org namespace,
because there's still no per-server publisher ownership. That
hijack-an-existing-server problem is real but **orthogonal** to this fix
and belongs in its own change (record publisher identity per server;
enforce it on update) — a follow-up to take alongside the OIDC hardening
below.
- **OIDC is untouched and remains coarser.** The `github-oidc` path
still grants the whole `io.github.<owner>/*` namespace to any workflow
with `id-token: write`, i.e. effectively anyone with write access to any
repo in the org, and it excludes non-Actions CI (Jenkins/GitLab can't
mint GitHub Actions OIDC). The admin-PAT path here is the
higher-assurance option for org publishing; OIDC stays as a
lower-assurance Actions convenience to be tightened separately.
## Revocation
The registry JWT is **5-minute, no-refresh** (per #264/#273), so loss of
Owner status propagates within minutes on the next token exchange, with
no revocation list to maintain.
## Tests
`go test ./internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/...` passes, including:
- member-role org is **not** granted; only admin orgs are
- a missing-scope `403` (no `read:org`) still yields the personal
namespace and no error
- an admin org on a **later page** of memberships is still granted
(pagination correctness)
- a `5xx` from the memberships call **fails closed** (no token issued)
rather than degrading to personal-only
- a rate-limit `403` (`X-RateLimit-Remaining: 0` / `Retry-After`)
**fails closed** — not mistaken for a missing-scope `403`
- existing org/name-validation tests updated to the new endpoint + role
shape
`gofmt`/`go vet`/`golangci-lint` (CI-pinned v2.11.4) clean; CI green on
all checks.
## Live verification
Confirmed end-to-end against real `api.github.com` (not just mocks) by
exercising this branch's `ExchangeToken` and decoding the `permissions`
claim of the returned JWT.
A dedicated org, **Tadasant Test Org** (login `Tadasant-Test-Org`), is
Owned by one account and has a second account joined as a plain
**member**. Both memberships are `active`, verified via the same
endpoint the fix uses (`GET /user/memberships/orgs/{org}`):
| Token (role) | `io.github.Tadasant-Test-Org/*` granted? | Other
patterns granted |
|---|---|---|
| Owner (`admin`) | ✅ yes | personal `io.github.<owner>/*` |
| member | ❌ no | personal `io.github.<member>/*` + the orgs that
account actually Owns |
The member case is the meaningful one: that membership is **active and
returned** by `GET /user/memberships/orgs`, and is excluded purely
because its role is `member`, not `admin`. Under the previous `GET
/users/{username}/orgs` behavior (membership = authority, no role), the
same active membership **would have granted** the org namespace. The
role filter is also selective rather than blanket-deny — the member
account still receives the namespaces of the orgs where it genuinely
holds Owner.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com>
|
||
|
|
7a4216c528 |
refactor: rename readBody to readErrorBody and cap body size (#1246)
## Summary Follow-up to #1241. Two small tweaks to the `readBody` helper: - **Rename `readBody` → `readErrorBody`.** The helper is only ever called on the error path (after a non-2xx status check), where we want a small string for diagnostics. The generic name made it look reusable on the success path, where streaming JSON decoding is the right approach. The new name pins the intended use down. - **Cap the read with `io.LimitReader` (8 KiB).** Defense in depth — error diagnostics never need more than a few KB, and we shouldn't buffer an arbitrarily large body from an upstream just to format an error message. 8 KiB is well above any realistic GitHub API or JWKS error response. No behavior change on the happy path. On the unhappy path, error messages are now bounded. ## Test plan - [x] `go build ./...` - [x] `go test ./internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/...` 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) |
||
|
|
6f9bd6661c |
refactor: extract readBody helper to remove duplicate io.ReadAll calls (#1241)
The same pattern for reading an error response body appeared in three places across the auth handlers: - `internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/github_at.go` (twice) - `internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/github_oidc.go` (once) A shared `readBody` helper function added to `common.go` now handles this in one place. The `io` import is removed from both files since it is no longer used directly there. --------- Co-authored-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
087d8085b7 |
Replace / with - for operation IDs (#660)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> Follow up from #658 addressing the feedback from @tadasant ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
1a7cd97099 |
Introduce v0.1 version of the API (#658)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> The following PR adds a new v0.1 API version. The goal is to mark v0.1 as a "freeze" point while keeping v0 as the moving target for new features so integrators can start building on top of something stable(r). Details: * This change is quite simple - we re-register the same handlers twice, once as `v0` and once as `v0.1` * Going forward, we'll keep v0.1 frozen while we add changes either on top of both (non-breaking) or we'll have to branch if breaking changes are necessary * We all acknowledge this is not exactly best-practice, but it gives us a way to gather feedback and allow clients to start integrating with the API without breaking them (**note** this implies a follow up PR that would branch the handlers used in v0.1). * For integrators/clients: please provide your feedback - what works well, what doesn't so we can take this into account going towards GA. ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> No, this just adds a new API version alongside the existing one. ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> Fixes: #649 Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
099a2d702e |
Deduplicate server JSON structs between publisher and registry (#318)
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> The following PR eliminates duplicate struct definitions by migrating the publisher tool to use canonical types from pkg/model, creating a single source of truth across the codebase. The publisher tool previously had its own copies of structs that were duplicated, ie. ServerJSON, Package, Repository, VersionDetail, EnvironmentVariable, RuntimeArgument and a few others which was not optimal **Changes in the PR:** - Refactored the structs to single canonical types located at pkg/model - Refactor the implementation to use/build canonical structures directly - Remove all duplicate definitions (5 structs eliminated) - Publisher now uses model.ServerJSON, model.Package, model.Repository, etc. - Renamed some of the structs to better reflect their use case, i.e. ServerJSON instead of ServerDetail - Fixes an issue where the Remote property was missing from the previous publisher copy of the Server **Benefits:** - Single source of truth - Schema changes in one place - Type safety - Compiler catches mismatches - Enhanced validation - Field constraints and bson tags - Zero breaking changes - Same CLI interface and JSON output - Future-proof - New canonical fields automatically available Supersedes: #217 and #240 ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> Locally ## Breaking Changes <!-- Will users need to update their code or configurations? --> No ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [ ] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> --------- Signed-off-by: Radoslav Dimitrov <radoslav@stacklok.com> |
||
|
|
12ab632d32 |
auth: Add GitHub OIDC auth (#278)
Adds support for auth'ing to the registry via [GitHub Actions OIDC](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/concepts/security/openid-connect). Fixes #271 ## Motivation and Context People will probably want to publish to the registry from CI environments. DNS auth can work here fine (https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/270). But for people who haven't set up DNS, the standard GitHub device flow won't really work here. We could make this nice by supporting GitHub Actions OIDC. ## How Has This Been Tested? Tested locally with a real GitHub OIDC token from a personal repo. ## Breaking Changes None ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [x] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [x] New and existing tests pass locally - [x] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed |
Renamed from internal/api/handlers/v0/auth/github.go (Previous history)