registry/docs/server-json/README.md
Tadas Antanavicius a5f417b6f5
Split "general" server.json from "registry-specific" server.json (#167)
Closes #155

The "generalized" `server.json` is the one that can be used in a variety
of situations:

- Discoverability on a centralized registry (i.e. our official Registry
work)
- Discoverability on a decentralized .well-known endpoint
- As a response to an initialization call, so the client knows
information about the MCP server to which it is connecting
- As an input into crafting a [DXT
file](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/desktop-extensions)
- Packaged in with the source code of an MCP server, so as to have a
structured way context

Of these, the official Registry is but one use case. The Registry has a
unique set of concerns for which we are optimizing, like whitelisting of
specific registries we trust to host MCP server source code for the
public community (`npm`, `pypi`, etc). It is not necessary to have such
a constraint for the generalized server.json, which may be used in, for
example, an internal context where such a validation doesn't make sense.

So I've done the following at a high level:
- Renamed the prior `schema.json` to be `registry-schema.json`
- Introduced a more generic `schema.json` to serve as the schema for the
generalized `server.json`
- Refactored `registry-schema.json` to be simply a constraint on the
base `schema.json`

I made a few small changes in this transition:
- Removed `gitlab` as an option in `repository.source` for
`registry-schema.json`. I'm fine going live with just GitHub support;
would be happy to take a contribution from e.g. Gitlab employees or a
motivated Gitlab customer to expand anytime.
- Removed `homebrew` as an option in `packages.registry_name`; never
really made sense, not a place where folks are publishing MCP servers
- Added `docker` to `packages.runtime_hint`; was just a missing
oversight
- Gave both schemas a global `$id`
~- Removed `release_date` from both schemas. Certainly not something
that makes sense for the generalized schema. It actually doesn't make
sense for the Registry schema either, because this is the server.json
that _users will submit_, i.e. the _input_ into the Registry publication
API. `release_date` will be a piece of _output_ metadata. The Registry
API will be free to append such extra metadata for GET /:id requests of
servers, and the data can be present in the OpenAPI spec, but it does
not need to be in the registry-server.json JSON schema.~
  - Note this is no longer in this PR; rebased on #168 which included it
- Removed unnecessary enums from the generalized `schema.json`
2025-07-09 14:02:43 -07:00

17 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

# server.json file
There are a variety of use cases where a _static representation of an MCP server_ is necessary:
- Discoverability on a centralized registry (i.e. our official Registry work)
- Discoverability on a decentralized `.well-known` endpoint
- As a response to an initialization call, so the client knows information about the MCP server to which it is connecting
- As an input into crafting a [DXT file](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/desktop-extensions)
- Packaged in with the source code of an MCP server, so as to have a structured way to identify a server given just its source code
All of these scenarios (and more) would benefit from an agreed-upon, standardized format that makes it easy to port around and maintain a consistent experience for consumers and developers working with the data. At the end of the day, it's all the same data (or a subset of it). MCP server maintainers should have to manage one copy of this file, and all these use cases can serve that file (or a programmatic derivative/subset of it).
Please note: this is different from the file commonly referred to as `mcp.json`, which is _an MCP client's configuration file for **running** a specific set of MCP servers_. See [this issue](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol/issues/292).
References:
- [schema.json](./schema.json) - The official JSON schema specification for this representation
- [examples.md](./examples.md) - Example manifestations of the JSON schema
- [registry-schema.json](./registry-schema.json) - A more constrained version of `schema.json` that the official registry supports