registry/docs/reference/server-json/official-registry-requirements.md
Radoslav Dimitrov 7a6d1bc30a
fix(cargo): harden README fetch, clarify status handling, strengthen tests (#1330)
Follow-up to #1207, addressing items from the cargo validator review.
**Scoped to cargo + shared helpers — no behavior change for existing
npm/pypi/nuget/oci/mcpb publishers.** Safe to merge and promote.

### Changes
**SSRF hardening of the two-call README retrieval**
- Pin the step-2 README URL to an allowed host (`static.crates.io` in
prod; the base host under test) *before* fetching, so a metadata
response can't steer the validator at an internal/attacker host.
- `CheckRedirect` policy pins every redirect hop to the same allowlist
(the initial URL being pinned isn't enough if an upstream 3xx is
followed).
- Cap the README body with `io.LimitReader` (5 MiB).

> Not publisher-exploitable today (the URL comes from crates.io), so
this is defense-in-depth — but it makes the "host is pinned" guarantee
hold in code rather than rely on crates.io's behavior.

**Clearer status handling** (previously any non-5xx/non-200 collapsed to
"not found")
- **429** → reported as transient/retryable, at both the metadata and
README steps.
- **403** → disambiguated via the crate-version endpoint:
genuinely-missing stays "not found"; *exists-but-no-README* gets an
actionable "add a README with `mcp-name` and republish" message (mirrors
the NuGet validator). This continues the 5xx-vs-403 diagnostic split
@P4ST4S started in the #1207 review — thanks!

**Shared `containsMCPNameToken` helper**
Boundary-anchored ownership-token match (prevents prefix confusion, e.g.
a README declaring `io.github.acme/widget-pro` satisfying a claim for
`io.github.acme/widget`), used here **by the cargo validator only**.
Adopting it in PyPI/NuGet is a separate follow-up because it's a
behavior change for those already-live registries.

**Tests & docs**
Hermetic positive `ServerNameFormats`; combined fixture gains a
version-existence endpoint + cases for 403-missing vs 403-no-README,
429, and prefix-confusion rejection; new foreign-README-host (SSRF)
test; internal test for the helper. Docs: list `crates.io` in the
registry-requirements list + the `Package` model doc.

### Testing
`go build`, `go vet`, full `./internal/validators/...` suite (incl. live
cargo positive), `make check-schema`, `validate-examples` all pass. No
new `golangci-lint` findings.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 17:34:54 -04:00

153 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown

# Official Registry Server.json Requirements
This document describes the additional requirements and validation rules that apply when publishing to the official MCP Registry at `registry.modelcontextprotocol.io`.
For step-by-step publishing instructions, see the [publishing guide](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/quickstart.mdx).
## Overview
While the [generic server.json format](./generic-server-json.md) defines the base specification, the official registry enforces additional validation to ensure:
- **Namespace authentication** - Servers are published under appropriate namespaces
- **Package ownership verification** - Publishers actually control referenced packages
- **Restricted registry base urls** - Packages are from trusted public registries
- **`_meta` namespace restrictions** - Restricted to `publisher` key only
## Namespace Authentication
Publishers must prove ownership of their namespace. For example to publish to `com.example/server`, the publisher must prove they own the `example.com` domain.
See the [publishing guide](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/quickstart.mdx) for authentication details for GitHub and domain namespaces.
## Package Ownership Verification
All packages must include metadata proving the publisher owns them. This prevents impersonation and ensures authenticity (see more reasoning in [#96](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/96)).
For detailed verification requirements for each registry type, see the [publishing guide](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/quickstart.mdx).
## Restricted Registry Base URLs
Only trusted public registries are supported. Private registries and alternative mirrors are not allowed.
**Supported registries:**
- **NPM**: `https://registry.npmjs.org` only
- **PyPI**: `https://pypi.org` only
- **NuGet**: `https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json` only
- **Cargo**: `https://crates.io` only
- **Docker/OCI**:
- Docker Hub (`docker.io`)
- GitHub Container Registry (`ghcr.io`)
- Quay.io (`quay.io`)
- Google Artifact Registry (`*.pkg.dev`)
- Azure Container Registry (`*.azurecr.io`)
- Microsoft Container Registry (`mcr.microsoft.com`)
- **MCPB**: `https://github.com` releases and `https://gitlab.com` releases only
## `_meta` Namespace Restrictions
The `_meta` field in `server.json` allows publishers to include custom metadata alongside their server definitions.
### Publisher-Provided Metadata
When publishing to the official registry, **only data under the specific key `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided` will be preserved**. Any other keys in the `_meta` object are silently dropped during publishing and will not be stored or returned by the registry.
**Example:**
```jsonc
{
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "1.0.0",
"custom_data": "your data here"
},
"some.other.key": {
// This will be dropped and not preserved
}
}
}
```
**Size limit:** The publisher-provided extension is limited to 4KB (4096 bytes) of JSON. If the marshaled JSON exceeds this limit, publishing will fail with an error indicating the actual size.
#### Recommended: Namespaced Subkeys
When your `publisher-provided` metadata gets large or comes from multiple sources (e.g. GitHub-specific hints alongside your own CI tool's metadata), grouping keys under reverse-DNS subkeys is a useful convention to avoid accidental collisions:
```jsonc
{
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"com.github": {
"serverDisplayName": "My Server"
},
"io.example.ci-publisher": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
}
}
}
```
This is **not enforced**; flat keys work fine for simple cases, and existing examples in this repo use the flat form. Use the namespaced form when organizing metadata from more than one source.
### Registry API Metadata vs server.json Metadata
The `_meta` field in `server.json` is **different** from the `_meta` field returned in registry API responses:
- **In `server.json`**: The `_meta` field contains publisher-provided custom metadata under `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided`
- **In API responses**: The `_meta` field is returned as a separate property at the response level (not inside `server.json`) and contains registry-managed metadata like:
- `status`: Server lifecycle status (active, deprecated, deleted)
- `publishedAt`: When the server was first published
- `updatedAt`: When the server was last updated
- `isLatest`: Whether this is the latest version
**Example: What you publish (server.json)**
```jsonc
{
"name": "io.github.example/my-server",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "My MCP server",
// ... other fields ...
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "2.0.0"
}
}
}
```
**Example: What the registry API returns**
```jsonc
{
"server": {
"name": "io.github.example/my-server",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "My MCP server",
// ... other fields ...
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "2.0.0"
}
}
},
"_meta": {
// Registry-managed metadata at response level
"status": "active",
"publishedAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
"isLatest": true
}
}
```
Notice how the registry API response has **two** `_meta` fields:
1. Inside the `server` object: Your publisher-provided metadata (preserved from server.json)
2. At the response level: Registry-managed metadata (automatically added by the registry)
Registry-managed metadata cannot be set or overridden by publishers. See the [API documentation](../api/generic-registry-api.md) for the complete response structure.