- Go 92.9%
- PLpgSQL 3.1%
- HTML 1.9%
- Shell 1.6%
- Makefile 0.5%
| Filename | Latest commit message | Latest commit date |
|---|---|---|
<!-- Provide a brief summary of your changes --> ## Motivation and Context Currently there are a couple shortcomings I found in the server.schema.json: - It uses `https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema` which is unfortunately [not supported by VS Code](https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/165219) - The Package schema does not require properties that are required by the service This means that need to round trip with the publish endpoint (perhaps spinning CI builds) to get the server.json right. It would be great if we could shift left and get indications in VS Code easier. I propose we downgrade the schema to `http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#`. The only difference for us is the name of `$def` pointers. I looked that [SchemaStore](https://github.com/SchemaStore/schemastore) and it looks like `draft-07` is by far the most popular. I believe the concession of using an older schema is worth it to get VS Code editor hints. Schema version | Count in SchemaStore -- | -- `http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#` | 292 `http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#` | 1972 `https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema` | 4 `https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema` | 4 <!-- Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? --> ## Open questions - [ ] Should package `transport` actually be required? Or should `stdio` be assumed? - [ ] Should package `registry_base_url` be required? All of the examples have it it's not required by the publish endpoint. ## How Has This Been Tested? <!-- Have you tested this in a real application? Which scenarios were tested? --> I have tried the new schema inside VS Code and I get helpful warning. For example, these are the warnings for the old schema. <img width="1561" height="919" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/474170b8-acf8-4dca-a3d9-66c68c0d1902" /> I have run these: `go run .\tools\validate-examples\main.go` `go run .\tools\validate-schemas\main.go ` ## Breaking Changes I don't think these are breaking changes. I am expressing what the publish endpoint enforces at runtime. ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [x] Documentation update ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [ ] I have read the [MCP Documentation](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) - [ ] My code follows the repository's style guidelines - [ ] New and existing tests pass locally - [ ] I have added appropriate error handling - [x] I have added or updated documentation as needed ## Additional context <!-- Add any other context, implementation notes, or design decisions --> |
||
| .githooks | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| .vscode | ||
| cmd | ||
| data | ||
| deploy | ||
| docs | ||
| internal | ||
| pkg | ||
| scripts | ||
| tests/integration | ||
| tools | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .golangci.yml | ||
| .goreleaser.yaml | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| Dockerfile | ||
| go.mod | ||
| go.sum | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
MCP Registry
The MCP registry provides MCP clients with a list of MCP servers, like an app store for MCP servers.
📤 Publish my MCP server | ⚡️ Live API docs | 👀 Ecosystem vision | 📖 Full documentation
Development Status
2025-09-08 update: The registry has launched in preview 🎉 (announcement blog post). While the system is now more stable, this is still a preview release and breaking changes or data resets may occur. A general availability (GA) release will follow later. We'd love your feedback in GitHub discussions or in the #registry-dev Discord (joining details here).
Current key maintainers:
- Adam Jones (Anthropic) @domdomegg
- Tadas Antanavicius (PulseMCP) @tadasant
- Toby Padilla (GitHub) @toby
Contributing
We use multiple channels for collaboration - see modelcontextprotocol.io/community/communication.
Often (but not always) ideas flow through this pipeline:
- Discord - Real-time community discussions
- Discussions - Propose and discuss product/technical requirements
- Issues - Track well-scoped technical work
- Pull Requests - Contribute work towards issues
Quick start:
Pre-requisites
- Docker
- Go 1.24.x
- golangci-lint v2.4.0
Running the server
# Start full development environment
make dev-compose
This starts the registry at localhost:8080 with PostgreSQL and seed data. It can be configured with environment variables in docker-compose.yml - see .env.example for a reference.
Alternative: Local setup without Docker
Prerequisites:
- PostgreSQL running locally
- Go 1.24.x installed
# Build and run locally
make build
make dev-local
The service runs on localhost:8080 by default. This can be configured with environment variables in .env - see .env.example for a reference.
Alternative: Running a pre-built Docker image
Pre-built Docker images are automatically published to GitHub Container Registry:
# Run latest stable release
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:latest
# Run latest from main branch (continuous deployment)
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:main
# Run specific release version
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:v1.0.0
# Run development build from main branch
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/modelcontextprotocol/registry:main-20250906-abc123d
Available tags:
- Releases:
latest,v1.0.0,v1.1.0, etc. - Continuous:
main(latest main branch build) - Development:
main-<date>-<sha>(specific commit builds)
Publishing a server
To publish a server, we've built a simple CLI. You can use it with:
# Build the latest CLI
make publisher
# Use it!
./bin/mcp-publisher --help
See the publisher guide for more details.
Other commands
# Run lint, unit tests and integration tests
make check
There are also a few more helpful commands for development. Run make help to learn more, or look in Makefile.
Architecture
Project Structure
├── cmd/ # Application entry points
│ └── publisher/ # Server publishing tool
├── data/ # Seed data
├── deploy/ # Deployment configuration (Pulumi)
├── docs/ # Documentation
├── internal/ # Private application code
│ ├── api/ # HTTP handlers and routing
│ ├── auth/ # Authentication (GitHub OAuth, JWT, namespace blocking)
│ ├── config/ # Configuration management
│ ├── database/ # Data persistence (PostgreSQL, in-memory)
│ ├── service/ # Business logic
│ ├── telemetry/ # Metrics and monitoring
│ └── validators/ # Input validation
├── pkg/ # Public packages
│ ├── api/ # API types and structures
│ │ └── v0/ # Version 0 API types
│ └── model/ # Data models for server.json
├── scripts/ # Development and testing scripts
├── tests/ # Integration tests
└── tools/ # CLI tools and utilities
└── validate-*.sh # Schema validation tools
Authentication
Publishing supports multiple authentication methods:
- GitHub OAuth - For publishing by logging into GitHub
- GitHub OIDC - For publishing from GitHub Actions
- DNS verification - For proving ownership of a domain and its subdomains
- HTTP verification - For proving ownership of a domain
The registry validates namespace ownership when publishing. E.g. to publish...:
io.github.domdomegg/my-cool-mcpyou must login to GitHub asdomdomegg, or be in a GitHub Action on domdomegg's reposme.adamjones/my-cool-mcpyou must prove ownership ofadamjones.mevia DNS or HTTP challenge
More documentation
See the documentation for more details if your question has not been answered here!