registry/docs/reference/server-json/official-registry-requirements.md
Radoslav Dimitrov a25f166b4b
docs: remove stale complete.md and fix remaining stale references (#1522)
Deletes `complete.md` and cleans up the last references to the
pre-restructuring docs layout.

## Why `complete.md` goes

It is 2,944 lines (31% of all documentation lines in the repo)
self-described as *"all documentation from the docs/ directory compiled
into a single markdown file"*. But:

- **No generator exists.** No make target, no workflow, no script. `grep
-rn "complete\.md"` finds **zero** references anywhere in the repo.
- **It mirrors a docs tree that no longer exists** — `docs/guides/`,
`docs/explanations/`, `docs/concepts/`.
- **All 72 of its relative links are broken**, and six of the basenames
it references exist nowhere in the repo.
- **~14 current docs are missing from it entirely** (`about.mdx`,
`authentication.mdx`, `package-types.mdx`, both CHANGELOGs, ...).
- **Its `server.json` examples pin the superseded `2025-07-09` schema**
(current is `2025-12-11`).

The strongest argument is its own last commit. [PR
#1278](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/pull/1278)
closed [issue
#767](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/767) — a
real user-reported CLI flag bug — by editing **only `complete.md`**. A
genuine fix landed in a file nobody reads, while the docs a reader would
actually find stayed wrong.

A generated file with no generator degrades into a trap: authoritative
enough that people edit it, with nothing validating it. If the
LLM-consumption use case is worth keeping, the right shape is a `make
docs-bundle` target plus a `check-docs-bundle` CI job mirroring the
existing `check-schema` pattern — happy to do that instead if you would
rather keep it.

## Remaining stale references

| File | Was | Now |
|---|---|---|
| `contributing/add-package-registry.md` | Add
`docs/guides/publishing/publish-[yourregistry].md`, update
`docs/guides/publishing/README.md` | Add a section to
`package-types.mdx`. These were the **last live references** to the
obsolete `docs/guides/` layout outside `complete.md` |
| `administration/maintainer-onboarding.md` | Add them to "Current key
maintainers" in README | "Registry Working Group" — the section that
actually exists |
| `reference/README.md` | Omitted 6 reference docs | Adds
`api/extensions.md`, `api/openapi.yaml`, `api/CHANGELOG.md`,
`server-json/CHANGELOG.md`, `server-json/CONTRIBUTING.md`,
`server-json/draft/` |
| `docs/README.md` | Index omitted `community-projects.md` | Listed |
| `reference/api/generic-registry-api.md` | `PUT .../versions/{version}`
"not implemented by official registry" | It **is** implemented
([edit.go:36](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/blob/main/internal/api/handlers/v0/edit.go#L36)),
and `official-registry-api.md` already lists it as an admin endpoint |
| `reference/api/official-registry-api.md` | Omitted 3 registered routes
| Adds `POST /v0.1/validate` (which `mcp-publisher validate` calls),
`GET /v0.1/ping`, `GET /v0.1/version`, and notes these plus `/health`
are absent from `openapi.yaml` |
| `server-json/official-registry-requirements.md` | Per-registry
verification → `quickstart.mdx` | → `package-types.mdx`, which has an
Ownership Verification section per registry |
| `design/design-principles.md` | Sections 1,2,3,4,**6**,7 | Renumbered
1–6 |
| `contributing/releasing.md` | Steps 1,2,3,**5**,6 | Renumbered 1–5 |

I left the sibling `DELETE` claim in `generic-registry-api.md` alone —
it is accurate, no DELETE route is registered (the `http.MethodDelete`
hit in `server.go` is CORS config, not a route).

## Staleness banners rather than rewrites

**`design/tech-architecture.md`** is substantially fictional. Rather
than a vague "may be outdated", the banner lists what I verified is
wrong:

- Describes Helm-chart deployment; the registry is a plain `Deployment`
([registry.go:65](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/blob/main/deploy/pkg/k8s/registry.go#L65)).
Helm is used only for third-party components.
- Diagram shows a `StatefulSet` on port **27017** — MongoDB's port. The
DB is PostgreSQL on 5432 via the CloudNativePG operator.
- Documents a `verify-domain` challenge flow (`POST /verify-domain`,
`/verify-domain/check`, server-issued tokens) that **was never built**.
- Documents `/admin/*` routes that are not registered.
- Says the DB stores user auth state and DNS verification records; only
`servers` and `server_extensions` tables exist.

**`design/roadmap.md`** still says "Phase 1: MVP/Go-Live (Current
Focus)" ~11 months after launch. I added a dated note rather than
inventing a current phase — that is a working-group call.

## Verification

All **101** remaining relative links across every `.md`/`.mdx` in the
repo resolve. The only two non-resolving matches are the intentional
`[project-name](link)` template placeholder and the moderation link
fixed in #1518.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 16:32:37 +03:00

153 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown

# Official Registry Server.json Requirements
This document describes the additional requirements and validation rules that apply when publishing to the official MCP Registry at `registry.modelcontextprotocol.io`.
For step-by-step publishing instructions, see the [publishing guide](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/quickstart.mdx).
## Overview
While the [generic server.json format](./generic-server-json.md) defines the base specification, the official registry enforces additional validation to ensure:
- **Namespace authentication** - Servers are published under appropriate namespaces
- **Package ownership verification** - Publishers actually control referenced packages
- **Restricted registry base urls** - Packages are from trusted public registries
- **`_meta` namespace restrictions** - Restricted to `publisher` key only
## Namespace Authentication
Publishers must prove ownership of their namespace. For example to publish to `com.example/server`, the publisher must prove they own the `example.com` domain.
See the [publishing guide](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/quickstart.mdx) for authentication details for GitHub and domain namespaces.
## Package Ownership Verification
All packages must include metadata proving the publisher owns them. This prevents impersonation and ensures authenticity (see more reasoning in [#96](https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/issues/96)).
For detailed verification requirements for each registry type, see [package types](../../modelcontextprotocol-io/package-types.mdx), which has an "Ownership Verification" section per registry.
## Restricted Registry Base URLs
Only trusted public registries are supported. Private registries and alternative mirrors are not allowed.
**Supported registries:**
- **NPM**: `https://registry.npmjs.org` only
- **PyPI**: `https://pypi.org` only
- **NuGet**: `https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json` only
- **Cargo**: `https://crates.io` only
- **Docker/OCI**:
- Docker Hub (`docker.io`)
- GitHub Container Registry (`ghcr.io`)
- Quay.io (`quay.io`)
- Google Artifact Registry (`*.pkg.dev`)
- Azure Container Registry (`*.azurecr.io`)
- Microsoft Container Registry (`mcr.microsoft.com`)
- **MCPB**: `https://github.com` releases and `https://gitlab.com` releases only
## `_meta` Namespace Restrictions
The `_meta` field in `server.json` allows publishers to include custom metadata alongside their server definitions.
### Publisher-Provided Metadata
When publishing to the official registry, **only data under the specific key `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided` will be preserved**. Any other keys in the `_meta` object are silently dropped during publishing and will not be stored or returned by the registry.
**Example:**
```jsonc
{
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "1.0.0",
"custom_data": "your data here"
},
"some.other.key": {
// This will be dropped and not preserved
}
}
}
```
**Size limit:** The publisher-provided extension is limited to 4KB (4096 bytes) of JSON. If the marshaled JSON exceeds this limit, publishing will fail with an error indicating the actual size.
#### Recommended: Namespaced Subkeys
When your `publisher-provided` metadata gets large or comes from multiple sources (e.g. GitHub-specific hints alongside your own CI tool's metadata), grouping keys under reverse-DNS subkeys is a useful convention to avoid accidental collisions:
```jsonc
{
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"com.github": {
"serverDisplayName": "My Server"
},
"io.example.ci-publisher": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
}
}
}
```
This is **not enforced**; flat keys work fine for simple cases, and existing examples in this repo use the flat form. Use the namespaced form when organizing metadata from more than one source.
### Registry API Metadata vs server.json Metadata
The `_meta` field in `server.json` is **different** from the `_meta` field returned in registry API responses:
- **In `server.json`**: The `_meta` field contains publisher-provided custom metadata under `io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided`
- **In API responses**: The `_meta` field is returned as a separate property at the response level (not inside `server.json`) and contains registry-managed metadata like:
- `status`: Server lifecycle status (active, deprecated, deleted)
- `publishedAt`: When the server was first published
- `updatedAt`: When the server was last updated
- `isLatest`: Whether this is the latest version
**Example: What you publish (server.json)**
```jsonc
{
"name": "io.github.example/my-server",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "My MCP server",
// ... other fields ...
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "2.0.0"
}
}
}
```
**Example: What the registry API returns**
```jsonc
{
"server": {
"name": "io.github.example/my-server",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "My MCP server",
// ... other fields ...
"_meta": {
"io.modelcontextprotocol.registry/publisher-provided": {
"tool": "ci-publisher",
"version": "2.0.0"
}
}
},
"_meta": {
// Registry-managed metadata at response level
"status": "active",
"publishedAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
"updatedAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z",
"isLatest": true
}
}
```
Notice how the registry API response has **two** `_meta` fields:
1. Inside the `server` object: Your publisher-provided metadata (preserved from server.json)
2. At the response level: Registry-managed metadata (automatically added by the registry)
Registry-managed metadata cannot be set or overridden by publishers. See the [API documentation](../api/generic-registry-api.md) for the complete response structure.